Structural Health Monitoring 2019 2019
DOI: 10.12783/shm2019/32270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Making Based on the Value of Information of Different Inspection Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are mainly related to the capability of providing continuous information about the global state of a structure without a prior knowledge about the location of possible damages and without the need to access the damaged portion of the structure. A quantification of the economic benefit provided by VBMs is not carried out in this paper, but the interested reader can refer to References 1–3. The possibility to detect damage using responses measured by sensors not necessarily deployed close to the—unknown—location of damage is one of the major advantages of the VBMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are mainly related to the capability of providing continuous information about the global state of a structure without a prior knowledge about the location of possible damages and without the need to access the damaged portion of the structure. A quantification of the economic benefit provided by VBMs is not carried out in this paper, but the interested reader can refer to References 1–3. The possibility to detect damage using responses measured by sensors not necessarily deployed close to the—unknown—location of damage is one of the major advantages of the VBMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the formulation can also be used for the problem of decisions made in a post-hazard scenario. This article expands upon the formulation proposed by Iannacone et al, 31 which included the deterioration of engineering systems in the analysis of the VoI of different inspection methods when managing the emergency after a shock. However, Iannacone et al 31 only considered the post-hazard scenario and used approximate models for deterioration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This article expands upon the formulation proposed by Iannacone et al, 31 which included the deterioration of engineering systems in the analysis of the VoI of different inspection methods when managing the emergency after a shock. However, Iannacone et al 31 only considered the post-hazard scenario and used approximate models for deterioration. Finally, the proposed formulation clearly distinguishes between epistemic and aleatory uncertainty in the deterioration of the system, using the outcome of SHM to reduce the former while keeping the latter unchanged (due to the randomness in the evolution of the system dictated by nature).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%