2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
93
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The method can be used for once-off decisions (Ferretti et al, 2014). It is the most comprehensive MCDA method and the most detailed way to investigate the internal structure of mining corporations, as a preference function is created for each criterion.…”
Section: ® Measuring Attractiveness By the Categorical-based Evaluatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method can be used for once-off decisions (Ferretti et al, 2014). It is the most comprehensive MCDA method and the most detailed way to investigate the internal structure of mining corporations, as a preference function is created for each criterion.…”
Section: ® Measuring Attractiveness By the Categorical-based Evaluatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria eventually in conflict-that create awareness about conservative interventions-can be also identified. Particular methodological approaches were: maturity matrix assessment [48], multi-attribute value theory (MAVT) [42], methodology for energy-efficient building refurbishment (MEEBR) [25], the functionality index [39], or other methods that require the use of computer simulation or numerical methods. This diversity and heterogeneity of tools shows the importance of using cross-disciplinary, multi-criteria, multi-index, multi-level procedures to develop an effective method/tool able to plan and assess different levels of sustainable interventions depending on the conservation needs, type of building, and climate conditions.…”
Section: Methodological Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the analysis, 14 documents (54%) describe methods referred to a low level of interventions i.e., preservation (e.g., [35,36]) and conservation (e.g., [37,38]) using the rule of minimum intervention and as much as possible non-destructive techniques. Five publications (19%) have as a primary driver mid-level interventions (i.e., refurbishment, rehabilitation) (e.g., [39][40][41]) while seven documents (27%) present methodological approaches applied to deeper interventions and the full restoration of decayed or abandoned buildings (e.g., [42][43][44][45] proves the importance, both in the heritage and sustainable sector, of keeping decision makers, owners, and local communities involved in HB conservation projects. Concern about the social aspect from the beginning may positively influence the planning of the interventions (i.e., maintenance, preservation, and refurbishment/restoration), as well as guarantee the long-lasting and effective application of advice coming from the research community.…”
Section: Methodological Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision-making process in view of cultural heritage's management is a multi-complex procedure [3], especially since restricted resource allocation is involved. Social attitudes at architectural heritage are highly important when funding is part of public expenses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%