Decision factors and benchmarks of EIA report quality for Japan’s cooperation projects

Kamijo, Tetsuya; Huang, Guangwei

doi:10.1007/s10668-020-00686-1

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The relevance of specific consultants' resources such as the number of consultants involved in the assessment has been emphasized in previous research as an essential driver for EIA effectiveness. (Kamijo and Huang 2019). Moreover, this driver has been also identified in multiple case studies in countries such as Egypt (Badr et al 2011), Greece (Cashmore et al 2002), and Cambodia (Chanthy and Grünbühel 2015).…”

Section: The Role Of Consultantsmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…The infrastructure literature shows no consensus regarding the required conditions for achieving EIA effectiveness (Hansen and Wood 2016;Heinma and Põder 2010;Khan et al 2020;Zvijáková et al 2014). Based on the literature review conducted, comprehensive composite conditions for EIA effectiveness were gathered from three main clusters: 1) the role of environmental consultants (Androulidakis and Karakassis 2006;Kågström 2016;Kamijo and Huang 2019;Khan et al 2018;Momtaz and Kabir 2013); 2) project features (Badr et al 2011;Cashmore et al 2002) , and; 3) communities' participation (Bond et al 2018;Chanthy and Grünbühel 2015;Morrison-Saunders and Bailey 2009). These clusters encompass the most relevant measures associated with accomplishing EIA effectiveness in accordance with the extant literature (Androulidakis and Karakassis 2006;Badr et al 2011;Morrison-Saunders and Bailey 2009).…”

Section: Drivers For Eia Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous research has evaluated EIA performance and identified that public participation plays a crucial role across pre-and post-submission phases in Europe (Barker and Wood 1999). This factor is even more relevant in developing countries, which traditionally have been recognized for their poor performance in this regard (Kamijo and Huang 2019).…”

Section: Communities' Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Androulidakis and Karakassis 2006;Kågström 2016;Kamijo and Huang 2019;Khan et al 2018;Momtaz and Kabir 2013), project features(Badr et al 2011;Cashmore et al 2002), and communities' participation(Chanthy and Grünbühel 2015;Morrison-Saunders and Bailey 2009) were identified.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness in Public–Private Partnerships: Study on the Colombian Toll Road Program

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public-private partnership (PPP) has been positioned as a relevant contracting method for developing large-scale infrastructure projects, which entail potentially high-magnitude negative impacts on the environment. The effectiveness of their Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is crucial to achieving sustainable development of these large-scale infrastructure projects. To unravel the drivers for the EIA effectiveness and the multiple combinations built by the complexity of these drivers, this paper analyzes 28 road PPP projects from Colombia employing a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach. This paper decodes conjectural causal links between specific conditions grouped in superordinate clusters (i.e., consultants' capability, project features, and communities' participation) and EIA effectiveness dimensions (i.e., normative, procedural, substantive, and transactive). Findings revealed that no single combination of causal conditions ensures multidimensional EIA effectiveness. This study demonstrated that EIA effectiveness relies significantly on the integration of specific features of three external stakeholders: consultants, nonpreferred proponents, and communities. This study constitutes the first empirical multidimensional identification of the combination of conditions that generate EIA effectiveness in road PPPs.

show abstract

Section: The Role Of Consultantsmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Drivers For Eia Effectivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Communities' Participationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness in Public–Private Partnerships: Study on the Colombian Toll Road Program

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Karena Jepang merupakan salah satu diantara negara Asia yang masuk pada kategori negara maju di Dunia dan memiliki system pemerintahan yang maju seperti negara-negara maju lainnya. Terlebih keungguluan Jepang dalam berbagai bidang cukup baik khususnya dalam teknologi informasi dan Komunikasi, (Kamijo, 2020). Menurut Berman, Moon & Choi (dalam Abdul 2020), Ditinjau berdasarkan sejarahnya, system administrasi pemerintahan Jepang dapat dibagi menjadi tiga periode: birokrasi pra-modern, pemerintahan Jepang sebelum perang, dan pemerintahan Jepang pascaperang.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perbandingan Implementasi E-Government Antara Jepang Dan Korea Selatan

Andita,

Ardelia,

Junaidi

et al. 2022

SaraqOpat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perkembangan teknologi sebagai bagian dari globalisasi telah membawa dunia pada kemudahan dan kemajuan dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan, salah satunya bagi instansi pemerintahan. Korea Selatan dan Jepang merupakan dua di antara banyaknya negara di dunia yang telah menerapkan e-government dengan baik. Perbandingan antara kedua negara tersebut menjadi fokus yang diteliti dengan metode analisis literatur secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan e-government di Jepang dan Korea Selatan berjalan cukup baik pada berbagai sektor seperti pendidikan, perpajakan, pengadaan barang dan jasa, dan lain-lain. Pencanangan e-government di Korea Selatan dimulai lebih awal, yakni pada tahun 1995, sedangkan di Jepang dimulai pada tahun 2001, namun perkembangan e-government di Jepang justru cenderung lebih cepat dan pesat sedangkan di Korea Selatan mengalami penurunan setelah adanya fragmentasi di kementerian dan lembaga. Walaupun setelah fragmentasi muncul upaya perbaikan dan percepatan yang dipimpin Perdana Menteri, namun proses ini tetap menemui kendala dan penurunan dalam pelaksanaannya. Di sisi lain, layanan yang diberikan pemerintah melalui system e-government di Jepang lebih banyak dan lengkap yang meliputi lebih banyak aspek yang tidak ada dalam system e-government di Korea Selatan, misalnya pelayanan untuk kelistrikan, informasi kelengkapan buku di perpustakaan, pemesanan fasilitas umum, beasiswa, dan lain-lain. Pada dasarnya kedua negara sudah melaksanakan sistem e-government dan menyediakan bentuk layanan publik yang hampir sama pada beberapa sektor utama yang mendukung hajat hidup masyarakat secara baik. Kedua negara ini juga berhasil menjadi dua di antara banyaknya negara di dunia yang telah menerapkan digitalisasi dalam proses pemerintahan termasuk dalam hal pelayanan publik sekaligus bisa menjadi contoh bagi negara lain dalam melaksanakan e-goverment.

show abstract

How to enhance EIA systems in developing countries: a quantitative literature review

Kamijo

2022

Environ Dev Sustain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decision factors and benchmarks of EIA report quality for Japan’s cooperation projects

Cited by 6 publications

References 46 publications

Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness in Public–Private Partnerships: Study on the Colombian Toll Road Program

Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness in Public–Private Partnerships: Study on the Colombian Toll Road Program

Perbandingan Implementasi E-Government Antara Jepang Dan Korea Selatan

How to enhance EIA systems in developing countries: a quantitative literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About