2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision Enhancement for Sourcing with Shared Service Centres in the Dutch Government

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were selected on the basis of their subject matter expertise [57], both data related and business related. This is consistent with other studies; see for example [43][44][45].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…They were selected on the basis of their subject matter expertise [57], both data related and business related. This is consistent with other studies; see for example [43][44][45].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…We present the 11 managerial challenges uncovered by our research. We present the lessons using the framework developed by Knol and Sol (2011) based on organizational perspectives literature (Ulrich and Barney, 1984). As we present each lesson, we review related findings in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miskon et al (2009) identified nine success factors and five failure factors for IT-SSCs. Knol and Sol (2011) classified managerial challenges into three perspectives: technical, managerial and organizational challenges. Finally, Knol et al (2014) organized the challenges managers face when adopting shared services in a taxonomy based on the organizational perspectives of resource dependence, efficiency and population (Ulrich and Barney, 1984).…”
Section: Shared Service Centers: a Management Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following design science methodology [9,10,12,20] and qualitative interview methods [22,57,58,59], this paper has respectively synthesised and qualitatively evaluated a design for a personal information transaction object (PITO) in accordance with the market design criteria espoused by Market Engineering theory [11] and extant market design practices [19,41,42,55,56] so as to render our prior Primary Personal Information Market (PPIM) system-architectural design [1] technically feasible to implement. It proposes that a permission-based PITO N/A "understanding the customer is probably the primary driver of the work in this organisation for the next so many years"…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interviews were conducted with senior leaders in data related business roles, who were selected on the basis of their subject matter expertise [57]. This is consistent with other studies; see for example [40,41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%