2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08685-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision curve analysis in the evaluation of radiology research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to multivariate Cox analysis, a higher risk score was revealed to be independently associated with poorer survival, supporting its potential for being an independent prognostic factor for HCC (p < 0.001, HR = 1.217, 95% CI: 1.166 - 1.217) ( Figure 5B ). Notably, DCA, a novel method that is used to assess clinical predictive models, diagnostic tests, and molecular markers ( 36 ), showed that our risk model achieves greater net benefit than any one single independent clinical parameter ( Figure 5C ). Additionally, the nomogram (C-index > 0.7) based on the clinical parameters and risk scores could effectively predict the probability of the1-, 2-, and 3- years OS ( Figure 5D ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to multivariate Cox analysis, a higher risk score was revealed to be independently associated with poorer survival, supporting its potential for being an independent prognostic factor for HCC (p < 0.001, HR = 1.217, 95% CI: 1.166 - 1.217) ( Figure 5B ). Notably, DCA, a novel method that is used to assess clinical predictive models, diagnostic tests, and molecular markers ( 36 ), showed that our risk model achieves greater net benefit than any one single independent clinical parameter ( Figure 5C ). Additionally, the nomogram (C-index > 0.7) based on the clinical parameters and risk scores could effectively predict the probability of the1-, 2-, and 3- years OS ( Figure 5D ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that the predicted probability was consistent with the actual probability. In the decision curve, 34 the theoretical relationship between the threshold probability and the relative value of false positive and false negative results was used to determine the clinical utility of the prediction model. These results verified the stability and reliability of our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present work only aimed to build an optimised pipeline for automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of chest CT, comparing different possible approaches for the AI modelling. For a more appropriate interpretation of the classifier performance, future developments should involve comparison with the performance of human readers and decision curve analysis [ 40 ] to verify whether Model3 actually provides added value in supporting clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%