The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2017.0049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DECISION-CTO: A “negative” clinical trial? Really?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Periprocedural MI an event possible only in the PCI arm was included in the primary combined endpoint, a significant crossover was observed, namely 18% from the OMT arm to the PCI arm. Finally, overall mortality in the PCI arm was lower than in the OMT arm (3.0% vs. 4.4% at 3 years follow-up, and 4.5% vs. 7.9% at 5 years follow-up), with a reduction of 50% in the particular case of cardiac death at the 3rd year (1.9% vs. 3.6%) [100].…”
Section: Short and Long Term Results Of Cto-pcimentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Periprocedural MI an event possible only in the PCI arm was included in the primary combined endpoint, a significant crossover was observed, namely 18% from the OMT arm to the PCI arm. Finally, overall mortality in the PCI arm was lower than in the OMT arm (3.0% vs. 4.4% at 3 years follow-up, and 4.5% vs. 7.9% at 5 years follow-up), with a reduction of 50% in the particular case of cardiac death at the 3rd year (1.9% vs. 3.6%) [100].…”
Section: Short and Long Term Results Of Cto-pcimentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Literatures reported only 1/3 of patients with CTO was intervened to their CTO lesion [2], but, we have managed to almost 2/3 of patients by PCI except those with CTO PCI failure. DECISION-CTO trial [31] randomized 834 patients and divided into CTO PCI + OMT group and OMT group, follow up for 3.1 years and reported similar clinical efficacy and quality of life between these groups. According ACC/AHA appropriate use criteria, if patients had better symptomatic relief, better functional and quality of life, they were indicated to revascularization [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unfortunately, details regarding the adequacy and methods of revascularization are yet not available, and the scientific community yearningly awaits such data for further argumentations. As an example, it would be interesting to know the prevalence of bifurcations and chronic total occlusions on the total amount of PCI performed in both conservative and invasive strategy groups [28], as lesion complexity seems to affect periprocedural and long-term outcomes [29,30], and to have a relevant implication on the subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy [31,32] as well. Similarly, the complexity of the revascularization treatment might have affected the outcome [33].…”
Section: The Extent Of Revascularization In Multivessel Coronary Artementioning
confidence: 99%