2022
DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1016522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decision-centered design of a clinical decision support system for acute management of pediatric congenital heart disease

Abstract: Background and ObjectivesChildren with congenital heart disease (CHD), have fragile hemodynamics and can deteriorate due to common childhood illnesses and the natural progression of their disease. During these acute periods of deterioration, these children often present to their local emergency departments (ED) where expertise in CHD is limited, and appropriate intervention is crucial to their survival. Previous studies identified that determining the appropriate intervention for CHD patients can be difficult … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coders independently identified utterances of decisions and reviewed their decision utterances for overlap (i.e., did they both identify the same decision utterances) to come to consensus. Once all utterances of decisions were identified, coders independently coded each decision utterance for key decision components based on a priori operational definitions identified in a previous study ( Table 2 ) ( 8 ). They also coded based on whether a decision utterance was CHD-specific (e.g., choosing to start an epinephrine infusion to support the function of the heart and increase cardiac output) or a general decision component (e.g., choosing to start antibiotics to treat a potential infection) to evaluate the effect of the CDSS on participants' non-CHD specific (general) decision making (i.e., recognition, investigation, and management of the intercurrent illness and other possible differential diagnoses).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coders independently identified utterances of decisions and reviewed their decision utterances for overlap (i.e., did they both identify the same decision utterances) to come to consensus. Once all utterances of decisions were identified, coders independently coded each decision utterance for key decision components based on a priori operational definitions identified in a previous study ( Table 2 ) ( 8 ). They also coded based on whether a decision utterance was CHD-specific (e.g., choosing to start an epinephrine infusion to support the function of the heart and increase cardiac output) or a general decision component (e.g., choosing to start antibiotics to treat a potential infection) to evaluate the effect of the CDSS on participants' non-CHD specific (general) decision making (i.e., recognition, investigation, and management of the intercurrent illness and other possible differential diagnoses).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified a lack of actionable guidance to support ED physicians in their decision making when confronted with a patient with CHD and intercurrent acute illness ( 7 ), and developed a prototype Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) using the critical decision method (CDM), called MyHeartPass TM ( Figure 1 ) ( 8 ). CDSS are systems that provide clinicians with disease and patient specific clinical knowledge and information to facilitate effective decision making, enhance patient care, and improve outcomes ( 9 , 10 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%