Decision and coordination in the dual-channel supply chain considering cap-and-trade regulation

Xu, Liang; Wang, Chuanxu; Zhao, Junjie

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.209

Cited by 189 publications

(95 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, the product substitutability aroused by low carbonization is bound to affect the supply chain management significantly. But, as a strategy to spur firms to improve environmental performance, low carbonization has strong externality and public interest features, and cannot generate direct economic benefits to the firms [16,33]. Consequently, with fiscal policies, national governments often levy taxes or provide subsidy in line with different products energy consumption to drive firms in supply chain to realize products replacement and low carbonization when maximizing the profit.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2019

RAIRO-Oper. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The carbon emission reduction has become an inevitable trend. Under the low-carbon environment, the government has been acting as an important role in the operation and management of supply chain. This paper considers four different governmental subsidy strategies, which includes none of members is subsidized (NS Scenario), only retailer is subsidized (RS Scenario), only manufacturer is subsidized (MS Scenario) and both members are subsidized (SS Scenario). A Stackelberg game model, which incorporates both governmental regulation and consumer's awareness of carbon emission, is developed to present the pricing and emission reduction behaviors for the supply chain members as well as the subsidy policies of government under different governmental subsidy strategies, and analyze the impact of relevant coefficients on the decisions and supply chain profits. It can be concluded that subsidizing to both members is more profitable for supply chain members and government in terms of environment protection and economic development. The results provide some managerial insights for the decision-makers and policy-makers to implement sustainability initiatives.Mathematics Subject Classification. 00A71.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2019

RAIRO-Oper. Res.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Surely, such policies consider tax rates or emission rates. Nevertheless, the role of the government as the policy provider is vital here; one of them is the cap-and-trade policy [5,30,31]. Table 3 shows the results of sensitivity analysis by varying emission tax in two different conditions.…”

Section: Numerical Experiments Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Zissis, et al [3] and Peng, et al [4] used a quantity discount as a medium in coordinating the supply chain to reduce carbon emission. Besides, revenue [5][6][7] and investment sharing [8] in the supply chain can reduce carbon emission. Supply Chain Management (SCM) become one of the centers of attention in a company with the aim of corporate sustainability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Green Supply Chain Model to Reduce Carbon Emission with Permissible Delay-in-Payment Consideration

Ibrahim

Putri

2019

JTI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In practice, the policy of delaying payment periods is prevalent between players in a supply chain system. Generally, payments made at the end of the permitted period. Supply chain management is one of the keys to corporate sustainability that the activities have an impact on the environment. This paper aims to develop an integrated green supply chain model with a permissible delay in payment consideration. In this research, the author develops a mathematical model to find the effect of delay in payment on emissions costs without ignoring the economic performance of a supply chain. The author develops four different scenarios model. Furthermore, numerical experiments and sensitivity analysis tests were conducted. Result of the study shows that delay in payment is integrated players into the supply chain system. It has a positive impact on reducing supply chain emissions costs.

show abstract

“…For I 4mb − β 2 − mα 2 > 0, the bound on I maintains the non-negativity of the optimal equilibrium solutions [1,56,65]. It can be seen that the objective function is a joint concave function of p, s, θ, and the target function has a maximum.…”

Section: Without Environmental Regulationmentioning

confidence: 96%

Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Under the threat of global warming, joint emission reduction strategy has been widely adopted as an effective solution for the industry to guarantee environmental sustainability. In the practice of supply chain, environmental regulations and supply chain contracts are applied with the attempt to improve environmental performance. However, whether these measures are actually effective remains unanswered. In this paper, we study a supply chain with one manufacturer and one retailer adopting joint emission reduction strategy. We first investigate under what circumstance the environmental regulation can effectively result in higher emission reduction efforts. The result shows that when the cost coefficient satisfies certain conditions, the increase of penalty or subsidy can lead to more investment in emission reduction. In addition, if the environmental impact caused by the production process is extremely high, the enforcement of the regulation is ineffective. We also explore how the cost-revenue-sharing contract affects the emission reduction strategy and the coordination of the members in the supply chain. The results suggest that the incentive effect of environmental regulation is more effective when the supply chain coordination contract exists. Numerical experiments are also presented to verify our analytical conclusions.

show abstract

Decision and coordination in the dual-channel supply chain considering cap-and-trade regulation

Cited by 189 publications

References 44 publications

Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness

Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness

Integrated Green Supply Chain Model to Reduce Carbon Emission with Permissible Delay-in-Payment Consideration

Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About