2017
DOI: 10.1111/mec.14292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering the origin of mito‐nuclear discordance in two sibling caddisfly species

Abstract: An increasing number of phylogenetic studies have reported discordances among nuclear and mitochondrial markers. These discrepancies are highly relevant to widely used biodiversity assessment approaches, such as DNA barcoding, that rely almost exclusively on mitochondrial markers. Although the theoretical causes of mito-nuclear discordances are well understood, it is often extremely challenging to determine the principal underlying factor in a given study system. In this study, we uncovered significant mito-nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong differentiation of three clusters was already visible in the PCA. Comparably high proportions of variance between groups had been found in other taxa for inter‐ and not intraspecific comparisons (e.g., Christe et al., ; Stemshorn, Reed, Nolte, & Tautz, ; Weigand et al., ). The strong clustering was further confirmed with the sNMF approach (Frichot et al., ), where individual ancestry coefficients are calculated comparable to methods such as STRUCTURE (Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strong differentiation of three clusters was already visible in the PCA. Comparably high proportions of variance between groups had been found in other taxa for inter‐ and not intraspecific comparisons (e.g., Christe et al., ; Stemshorn, Reed, Nolte, & Tautz, ; Weigand et al., ). The strong clustering was further confirmed with the sNMF approach (Frichot et al., ), where individual ancestry coefficients are calculated comparable to methods such as STRUCTURE (Pritchard, Stephens, & Donnelly, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This seems intuitive, given the complex set of, for example, diagnostic behavioral, ecological, genetic, and/or phenotypic differences we can observe among sister lineages, and which may arise at different times in the speciation process and are thus no necessities for defining the species category (de Queiroz, ). As speciation is not always correlated with morphological differentiation (Daïnou et al., ), morphological species identification can be impeded by low phenotypic differentiation or even so‐called morphological stasis, high intraspecific phenotypic variability with only the phenotypically “extreme” forms being recognizable or an inadequate set of potentially diagnostic characteristics (Bickford et al., ; Fontaneto, Giordani, Melone, & Serra, ; Weigand et al., , ). To deal with this problem, molecular markers are increasingly integrated in the process of species identification, an approach termed “DNA barcoding”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, combinations of multiple markers increase delimitation success for closely related species compared to single marker work (Dupuis, Roe, & Sperling, ). Nevertheless, as multiple markers derived from mitochondrial reads represent a single linkage group or could represent mitonuclear discordance as a result of introgression (Weigand et al., ), the use of independent nuclear markers should also be considered to resolve the presence of cryptic species (Campos‐Soto, Torres‐Pérez, & Solari, ; Miyamoto, Allard, Adkins, Janecek, & Rodney, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database comprised in silico translated gene‐prediction sequences of genomic data of four Trichoptera species: Stenopsyche tienmushanensis (Luo, Tang, Frandsen, Stewart, & Zhou, ), Glossosoma conformis (Weigand et al, ), Sericostoma personatum (Weigand et al, ) and Limnephilus lunatus (Poelchau et al, ). Predicted protein sequence data were downloaded from respective repositories and fasta files concatenated using command‐line tool cat (Unix).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database comprised in silico translated gene-prediction sequences of genomic data of four Trichoptera species: Stenopsyche tienmushanensis (Luo, Tang, Frandsen, Stewart, & Zhou, 2018), Glossosoma conformis (Weigand et al, 2018), Sericostoma personatum (Weigand et al, 2017) and Limnephilus lunatus (Poelchau et al, 2015).…”
Section: Construction Of a Homology-based Sequence Databasementioning
confidence: 99%