Deciphering the Jurassic–Cretaceous evolution of the Hamadan metamorphic complex during Neotethys subduction, western Iran

Abstract

The Hamadan high-grade metapelites in the northwestern part of the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, Iran, show a polymetamorphic evolution with relics of a garnet-bearing metamorphic mineral assemblage (M1), a contact metamorphic overprint (M2) related to the emplacement of the Middle to Late Jurassic Alvand composite pluton and a Buchan-type regional metamorphic event (M3) marked by 40Ar/39Ar ages in the 80–70 Ma range that is associated with penetrative ductile deformation producing a foliation and a thermal overprint onto the M2 assemblages. The M1 event is exclusively preserved as small garnet grains and mineral inclusions contained therein, incorporated into M2-stage cordierite porphyroblasts. Distinct metamorphic zones are developed over a region of ~ 600 km2, which are partly correlated with distance to the composite pluton: zones (1) cordierite + K-feldspar hornfels, and (2) andalusite ± cordierite hornfels that surround the Alvand composite pluton at a distance of up to 5 km. These two zones are clearly related to M2 metamorphism associated with pluton emplacement. Zones (3) staurolite schist, (4) andalusite schist, and (5) sillimanite schist are found outside of the contact aureole and are considered to be the result of regional M3 metamorphism in the eastern part distant to the Alvand composite pluton. Conventional thermobarometry shows that temperatures in the area vary between ~ 560 and 660 °C for zones 1 and 2 and ~ 490 and 690 °C for zones 3–5. Phase equilibria modelling in the MnNCKFMASHT system indicates two distinct isobaric prograde paths at low pressures, at ~ 2.7 kbar for zones 1 and 2 and slightly higher pressures of around 3.5–5.5 kbar for zones 3–5. U–Th–Pb monazite geochronology revealed overlapping ages of 168 ± 11 Ma and 149 ± 19 Ma in the hornfels (1 and 2) and schistose (3–5) zones, respectively. These ages are similar to the intrusion age of the Alvand composite pluton (153.3 ± 2.7 to 166.5 ± 1.8 Ma) and are interpreted to reflect heating due to the emplacement of the composite pluton (M2 contact metamorphic event). However, 40Ar/39Ar dating of white mica and amphibole yielded plateau ages ranging from 80 to 69 Ma over the entire transect. The formation of schistosity in zones 3–5 postdates the intrusion and is thus related to M3 metamorphism. The white mica fabric indicates formation of the foliation during M3 garnet growth, which is followed by local retrogression of garnet to chlorite during exhumation. Consequently, the 40Ar/39Ar white mica and amphibole ages likely indicate reheating during M3 to more than ca. 500 ± 25 °C (argon retention temperature in amphibole). These data establish the occurrence of a Cretaceous, Buchan-style regional metamorphic event that had not been firmly identified before. Subsequent Late Cretaceous exhumation of the Hamadan complex with its high-grade metapelites is due to extension along the Tafrijan–Mangavi–Kandelan fault, which represents a major ductile low-angle normal fault. Metamorphic temperatures coupled with mineral ages from this and published work suggest a fast stage of cooling with a rate of ~ 6 °C/Ma during exhumation after M3 metamorphism.

P–T–t path of the Boroujerd Complex, north‐west Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone, western Iran: Insights from phase equilibrium modelling and thermobarometry

“…In Boroujerd region, the tectonometamorphic evolution resembles that proposed by Mahmoudi and Baharifar (2019) probably pluton emplacement, especially the relatively hot mafic magmatic component of the complex (Jafari et al, 2020); this is a similar to the scenario proposed for the Hamedan region (Baharifar et al, 2019;Mahmoudi & Baharifar, 2019;Monfaredi et al, 2020;Saki et al, 2020;Sepahi et al, 2019). Therefore, the Hamedan and Boroujerd metamorphic sequences experienced a similar metamorphic evolution in the Lower to Middle Jurassic, which suggests along-strike metamorphic histories at this time are similar along the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone.…”

“…Studies of the metamorphic history of the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone in Iran have mainly focused on the Hamedan region where low-to medium-grade metamorphic rocks are intruded by felsic to mafic bodies from the Middle to Late Jurassic Alvand Plutonic Complex (ca. 154-167 Ma; e.g., Sepahi & Fadavi, 2009;Sepahi, Jafari, Osanai, Shahbazi, & Moazzen, 2019;Shahbazi et al, 2010;Mahmoudi & Baharifar, 2019;Saki, Miri, & Oberhänsli, 2020;Monfaredi et al, 2020 and references therein). In Hamedan, poly-metamorphic (e.g., Monfaredi et al, 2020;Saki et al, 2020;Saki, Moazzen, & Baharifar, 2012) or a single counterclockwise metamorphic evolution (e.g., Baharifar, Whitney, Pang, Chung, & Iizuka, 2019;Mahmoudi & Baharifar, 2019) were proposed; these have significantly different tectonic implications for the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone.…”

“…See text for more details [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]The Hamedan metamorphic sequence records a complex P-T evolution. Some authors suggest a polymetamorphism evolution (e.g.,Monfaredi et al, 2020), whereas other points to a single counterclockwise metamorphic event(Baharifar et al, 2019;Mahmoudi & Baharifar, 2019) Monfaredi et al (2020). described three metamorphic events: M 1 from a relict mineral assemblage that included garnet, M 2 associated to a contact metamorphic overprint for intrusion of the Alvand iIgneous Complex (ca.…”

Geochronology and geochemistry of the Ediacaran orthogneisses from the north Shahrekord (Sadegh‐Abad), Sanandaj‐Sirjan Zone: Insights into magmatic evolution of the Iranian basement

“…reported from other regions of the SaSZ (e.g., Davoudian et al, 2016;Monfaredi et al, 2020;Shabanian et al, 2018Shabanian et al, , 2020Shakerardakani et al, 2015). The closure temperature of white mica varies from 550 C for pure phengite (e.g., Di Vincenzo, Tonarini, Lombardo, Castelli, & Ottolini, 2006;Oberhaensli, Bousquet, Candan, & Okay, 2012;Qiu et al, 2010;Villa, 1998) to 350 ± 50 C for pure muscovite (Hames & Bowring, 1994;Harrison, Célérier, Aikman, Hermann, & Heizler, 2009).…”

“…The metamorphic complexes of the SaSZ have been attributed to Precambrian and Palaeozoic (in southern parts of the SaSZ) protoliths affected largely by Mesozoic metamorphism (e.g., Davoudian et al, 2016; Jamali Ashtiani et al, 2020; Shakerardakani et al, 2021 and references therein). The metamorphic grade of the complexes is reported to be mainly greenschist and lower to upper amphibolite facies (e.g., Berberian & King, 1981) of Jurassic and Cretaceous age (Monfaredi et al, 2020; Shakerardakani et al, 2021). However, high‐pressure/low‐temperature metamorphism is also reported from the NSMC (Davoudian et al, 2008) and its formation has been related to the subduction of the Neo‐Tethys Ocean beneath SaSZ during Early Jurassic times (Davoudian et al, 2016).…”