2020
DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering the heterogeneity of myeloid cells during neuroinflammation in the single‐cell era

Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disabling neuroinflammatory disease, which is little understood and lacks a sufficient therapeutic regimen. Myeloid cells have repeatedly shown to play a pivotal role in the disease progression. During homeostasis, only the CNS‐resident microglia and CNS‐associated macrophages are present in the CNS. Neuroinflammation causes peripheral immune cells to infiltrate the CNS contributing to disease progression and neurological sequelae. The differential involvement of the diverse periph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 210 publications
(291 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular relevance here is the increased expression of degradative lysosomal enzymes such as dipeptidyl peptidase, tripeptidyl peptidase, and Cathepsin D (CatD) in microglial cells as compared to macrophages (Majumdar et al, 2007). Also important in this regard are differences between microglial cells from inflamed CNS and those recruited from bloodderived monocytes; the substantial differences recently identified between these cell types implies their response to the P2X 7 receptor could well differ (Lapenna et al, 2018;Borst and Prinz, 2020;Yu et al, 2020). While the relative paucity of data from microglial cells on how the P2X 7 receptor alters clearance means that some of the information presented in this review has been obtained from macrophages, the reader should be aware that application of results from macrophages to microglial cells has limitations.…”
Section: Microglia Inflammation and Clearancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Of particular relevance here is the increased expression of degradative lysosomal enzymes such as dipeptidyl peptidase, tripeptidyl peptidase, and Cathepsin D (CatD) in microglial cells as compared to macrophages (Majumdar et al, 2007). Also important in this regard are differences between microglial cells from inflamed CNS and those recruited from bloodderived monocytes; the substantial differences recently identified between these cell types implies their response to the P2X 7 receptor could well differ (Lapenna et al, 2018;Borst and Prinz, 2020;Yu et al, 2020). While the relative paucity of data from microglial cells on how the P2X 7 receptor alters clearance means that some of the information presented in this review has been obtained from macrophages, the reader should be aware that application of results from macrophages to microglial cells has limitations.…”
Section: Microglia Inflammation and Clearancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Less invasive means to distinguish resident microglia from infiltrated macrophages rely on cytofluorimetry by assessing the marker CD45, which is expressed at low levels in resident cells ( Martin et al, 2017 ; Rangaraju et al, 2018 ), or more recently, on the use of single-cell RNA sequencing. This latter technique has helped identify the specific transcriptional fingerprints of selective brain myeloid populations ( Borst and Prinz, 2020 ; Olah et al, 2020 ; Rajan et al, 2020 ; Hsiao et al, 2021 ). However, both cytofluorimetry and single-cell transcriptomics need tissue disintegration, thus, failing to keep enough spatial information, which is certainly a key aspect to be considered when studying focal brain injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signature transcriptomes between reactive and homeostatic microglia (and also astrocytes) was also surveyed for their conjoint expression between both states. Homeostatic transcriptomes were designated to exclude the signature of reactive transcriptomes and vice versa, referring to the literature reports by Prinz et al [106][107][108][109][110][111][112] , and Kim et al 105 , so that Sall1 and Hexb took the role of counting the number of microglia as each microglia express these genes constitutively while assuming that these transcriptomes did not increase in quantity per microglia when reactive 105,111 . As spatial transcriptomic imaging using Visium yielded linear (semi)quantitative (due to log1p transformation for further processing using Seurat 4.0)) metric, no fractional presentation was adopted to disclose that homeostatic microglia were increased in quantity of signature per spot in 5xFAD mice compared with wild type or P301L mice.…”
Section: Methods To Scrutinize Spatial Cell-type Cell-state Specific ...mentioning
confidence: 99%