2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering the atmospheric signal in marine sulfate oxygen isotope composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…distributed over the anoxic oceanic water mass and underlying sediment. This value is several times lower than estimates of modern sulfate reduction rates (56), implying that the Ediacaran sulfur cycle may have been smaller than it is today. Therefore, it is likely that the deep ocean remained ferruginous across this transition, consistent with redox proxy records (33,49,50).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…distributed over the anoxic oceanic water mass and underlying sediment. This value is several times lower than estimates of modern sulfate reduction rates (56), implying that the Ediacaran sulfur cycle may have been smaller than it is today. Therefore, it is likely that the deep ocean remained ferruginous across this transition, consistent with redox proxy records (33,49,50).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Sulfate ∆ 17 O trends corroborate the importance of MSR and secondary sulfur recycling in downstream catchments. Although the mass-dependent relationship describing MSR (θ MSR ) is poorly constrained, it likely lies between 0.5270 and 0.5305 (58). If we assume pyrite oxidation throughout the catchment generates primary sulfate with an isotope composition similar to that observed in high-elevation headwater streams, then fractionation by MSR would lead to the observed increase in δ 18 O as well as a slight decrease in ∆ 17 O of residual sulfate (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the measurement of Δ 17 O SO4 values, two methods are in use: (1) laser fluorination 24 and (2) pyrolysis 25 . Laser fluorination generates O 2 from >10 μmol of natural sulfate converted into BaSO 4 with a precision in Δ 17 O of 0.02–0.05‰ 17,24,26 . For smaller sample sizes, e.g., aerosol sulfate from ice cores, the pyrolysis method is used 5–8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are recorded as variable Δ 17 O SO4 values in sulfates from ice cores [5][6][7][8] or desert soils. [9][10][11] These records trace the global-scale intra-decadal ENSO climate cycles, 12 and the distribution and biologic cycling of SAS deposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%