2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering the active origin for urea oxidation reaction over nitrogen penetrated nickel nanoparticles embedded in carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low value suggests that the kinetic rate slightly depends on the urea concentration, which can be explained by these assumptions: (i)the strong affinity of urea to the nickel peroxide particles. Several works have studied the adsorption of urea molecules on various adsorbents: nickel(II) oxide NiO, 43 nickel nanoparticles embedded in carbon nanotubes, 44 and nickel(III) sites 45 . Whatever the adsorbent nature, a strong affinity of urea with nickel 43 and a low adsorption energy of urea 46 have been reported.…”
Section: Results On the Kinetic Of The Catalytic Indirect Urea Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low value suggests that the kinetic rate slightly depends on the urea concentration, which can be explained by these assumptions: (i)the strong affinity of urea to the nickel peroxide particles. Several works have studied the adsorption of urea molecules on various adsorbents: nickel(II) oxide NiO, 43 nickel nanoparticles embedded in carbon nanotubes, 44 and nickel(III) sites 45 . Whatever the adsorbent nature, a strong affinity of urea with nickel 43 and a low adsorption energy of urea 46 have been reported.…”
Section: Results On the Kinetic Of The Catalytic Indirect Urea Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the binding energy of Ni 0 for Ni@DC-0.03, Ni@DC-0.04, Ni@DC-0.05, and Ni@DC-0.06 is 852.1, 852.4, 852.7, and 853.2 eV, respectively. The upward shift indicates that the electronic environment of Ni is regulated by the electron shift from Ni to the defective carbon species. Furthermore, as seen in Figure b, the C 1s peaks at 285.7 and 289.8 eV are related to C–O and CO 3 2– groups, respectively, , indicating that the carbon layer surface is rich in oxygen-containing functional groups. It is noteworthy that the strongest signal peaks are all around the binding energy (BE) of 284.0 eV, demonstrating that the carbon layer of the Ni@DC- x is always dominated by sp 2 , and the carbon layer is rich in defects. , In detail, the binding energies of sp 2 C for Ni@DC-0.03, Ni@DC-0.04, Ni@DC-0.05, and Ni@DC-0.06 are 284.2, 283.9, 283.6, and 283.2 eV, respectively, suggesting that the binding energy of sp 2 C decreases with the increment of carbon defects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5b), typically due to the inception of strongly adsorbed intermediates. [44][45][46][47] This observation may explain the discernable passivation effect noticed in Ni(OH) 2 -gPF, 45 evidencing that selfassembled c-oriented Ni(OH) 2 lms prociently mitigate the genesis of such intermediates and the passivation trend.…”
Section: Electrochemical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%