2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering taxonomic and functional diversity of fungi as potential bioindicators within confluence stretch of Ganges and Yamuna Rivers, impacted by anthropogenic activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of metagenome projects investigating the presence and activity of fungal communities in environmental samples has been rapidly increasing [118]. These studies of the mycobiome have been focused on samples from diverse sources such as water (e.g., Brumfield et al [119]), air (e.g., Calderón-Ezquerro et al [120], soil/sediments (e.g., Samson et al [121]), plants (e.g., Nguyen et al [122], Yang et al [123]) and humans (e.g., Hall et al [124], Hanger et al [125]). The number of complete fungal genomes and fungal environmental DNA/RNA sequences in public databases has grown considerably, reaching more than a billion reads just considering the ITS region [126].…”
Section: Culture-independent Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of metagenome projects investigating the presence and activity of fungal communities in environmental samples has been rapidly increasing [118]. These studies of the mycobiome have been focused on samples from diverse sources such as water (e.g., Brumfield et al [119]), air (e.g., Calderón-Ezquerro et al [120], soil/sediments (e.g., Samson et al [121]), plants (e.g., Nguyen et al [122], Yang et al [123]) and humans (e.g., Hall et al [124], Hanger et al [125]). The number of complete fungal genomes and fungal environmental DNA/RNA sequences in public databases has grown considerably, reaching more than a billion reads just considering the ITS region [126].…”
Section: Culture-independent Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the tissue of aquatic organisms, biomass concentration will be unnecessary [32,34,59]. Genetic material from biomass-rich sediment samples (0.2 to 1 g) and sludge samples (0.5 mL) can also be extracted directly [45,51,60,61,75], or after centrifugation of small to medium slurry volumes (2 to 50 mL) with collection of the pellets [52,62,69]. Zooplanktonic biomass can be harvested with meshes having 200 µm openings [36], while the biomass of algae [74] and cyanobacteria [48] can be isolated by medium to large volume centrifugation (0.05 to 1 L).…”
Section: Biomass Collection and Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi make up a significant component of the benthic microbial biomass in freshwater ecosystems, and play a pivotal role in decomposing organic matter in river habitats (Pascoal and Cassio 2004;Zhang et al 2013). In general, representatives of Ascomycota account for the largest number of species recovered from water systems (Kelley et al 2001;Liu et al 2015;Khomich et al 2017;Sutcliffe et al 2018;Samson et al 2020), their asexual forms with stauro-or scolecoconidia (aquatic hyphomycetes) being the most representative fungal group in freshwater environments (Pascoal et al 2005;Jones and Pang 2012). Although common Ascomycota like Penicillium species are not considered aquatic fungi, they are one of the most common genera identified from freshwater (Pitt 1979;Hageskal et al 2006;Sonjak et al 2006;Samson et al 2010;Heo et al 2019;Pangging et al 2019) and recently were also reported in marine environments (Kirichuk et al 2017;Gonçalves et al 2019;Grossart et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%