2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-019-1079-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering species relationships and evolution in Chenopodium through sequence variations in nuclear internal transcribed spacer region and amplified fragment-length polymorphism in nuclear DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The various members of the Chenopodium species complex are notoriously challenging to identify in the field [ 41 ]. A variety of barcode markers have been suggested for discriminating all members of the genus with DNA sequencing [ 15 , 17 , 18 , 42 , 43 ]. In some practical situations, however, a universal marker is not required; rather, what is needed is a robust assay for distinguishing the species likely to be encountered in a specific region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various members of the Chenopodium species complex are notoriously challenging to identify in the field [ 41 ]. A variety of barcode markers have been suggested for discriminating all members of the genus with DNA sequencing [ 15 , 17 , 18 , 42 , 43 ]. In some practical situations, however, a universal marker is not required; rather, what is needed is a robust assay for distinguishing the species likely to be encountered in a specific region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations in Chenopodium primarily relied on conventional molecular markers for phylogenetic analysis and species identification. These markers include nuclear DNA amplification fragment length polymorphism, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internally transcribed spacer sequence (ITS) variation, and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) fragments [24][25][26][27][28]. However, these research methods have limitations due to the restricted information they provide regarding mutation sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%