2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72766-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering collaborative sidechain motions in proteins during molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: The dynamic structure of proteins is essential for their functions and may include large conformational transitions which can be studied by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. However, details of these transitions are difficult to automatically track. To facilitate their analysis, we developed two scores of correlation between sidechain dihedral angles. The CIRCULAR and OMES scores are computed from, respectively, dihedral angle values and rotamer distributions. As a case study, we applied our methods to an a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(275 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rotamerization of N3.35 from the inward to the outward orientation was observed in several AT2h trajectories (Table III). The outward orientation favors sodium release and subsequent activation [42]. Noteworthy, in one of these trajectories, we observed a steric clash between W6.48 and M3.36, just before the N3.35 outward motion, suggesting that the presence of a methionine at position 3.36 might favor the rotamerization of N3.35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The rotamerization of N3.35 from the inward to the outward orientation was observed in several AT2h trajectories (Table III). The outward orientation favors sodium release and subsequent activation [42]. Noteworthy, in one of these trajectories, we observed a steric clash between W6.48 and M3.36, just before the N3.35 outward motion, suggesting that the presence of a methionine at position 3.36 might favor the rotamerization of N3.35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…6 ), which is essential for regulating the interaction between S1 and ACE2. Secondly, the comparative analysis was performed by overlapping the backbone angles ( ϕ ; ψ ) of all three interacting residues Y449, N487, and T500 in S1 [ 5 ], since torsional angle among amino acids is essential for maintaining the structural integrity of a protein system [ 77 ]. Comparing the change in torsional backbone angle of S1 upon interacting with ACE2p and DS9 peptide could effectively validate the ability of DS9 to alter the structural integrity of S1’s pathogenic conformation that can be observed from S1-ACE2p’s interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize the H-bonding pattern of N3.35 observed in the AT1 and AT2 receptors, the inward orientation of N3.35 was always stabilized by H-bond interactions, although at various extents. Thus, in each of the receptors, the collapse of these H-bonds upon the outward rotamerization of N3.35 should destabilize the receptor structure and favour activation, as observed for CXCR4 [ 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%