2016
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciphering and Targeting Oncogenic Mutations and Pathways in Breast Cancer

Abstract: Advances in DNA and RNA sequencing revealed substantially greater genomic complexity in breast cancer than simple models of a few driver mutations would suggest. Only very few, recurrent mutations or copy-number variations in cancer-causing genes have been identified. The two most common alterations in breast cancer are TP53 (affecting the majority of triple-negative breast cancers) and PIK3CA (affecting almost half of estrogen receptor-positive cancers) mutations, followed by a long tail of individually rare … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
4
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, we determined that most breast cancers differed from all others (27). Significant correlations between TP53 mutational status and certain clinicopathological characteristics of the primary tumor were in concordance with literature data (29). BRCA1/2 are tumor suppressor genes that are involved in DNA repair pathways associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Based on these results, we determined that most breast cancers differed from all others (27). Significant correlations between TP53 mutational status and certain clinicopathological characteristics of the primary tumor were in concordance with literature data (29). BRCA1/2 are tumor suppressor genes that are involved in DNA repair pathways associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It seems, however, that only stable EBV positive tumors, that is, those without mutations, confer the anticipated favorable outcome as compared to EBV negative tumors. This on/off mutation effect on patient outcome has been described before and it seems that it is not gene specific but rather reflects different oncogenic processes and tumor‐host interactions operating in each class of tumors. Genomic instability in NPC seems clinically important because it affects drug‐targetable genes and pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Another point concerns mutated cells displaying an apparently normal phenotype despite typical oncogenic genome alterations. [87][88][89][90][91][92] Actual unambiguous precancer lesions may appear after a long latent period or may possibly never appear. Then, transition from indolent precancer to cancer, a likely infinitesimal probability event involving a trophoblastic-like reprogramming, would yet again be lasting a long time ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Modulation Of Tumor Propagation By Gap Junction Intercellulamentioning
confidence: 99%