2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3067144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decimeter Level Indoor Localization Using WiFi Channel State Information

Abstract: Indoor localization using WiFi signal parameters is challenging, with encouraging decimeter localization results available with enough line-of-sight coverage and hardware infrastructure. This paper proposes a new 2-dimensional multiple packets based matrix pencil (2D M-MP) method to estimate the Angle of Arrival (AoA) and Time of Flight (ToF) based on WiFi channel state information (CSI). Compared with the conventional parameter estimation algorithms, this method has two advantages. First, 2D M-MP method uses … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, CSI is expressed through M receiving antennas and N equidistant subcarriers [15]. Each element of this matrix is a linear combination of multipath components, as presented in Equation 3.…”
Section: A Channel State Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, CSI is expressed through M receiving antennas and N equidistant subcarriers [15]. Each element of this matrix is a linear combination of multipath components, as presented in Equation 3.…”
Section: A Channel State Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements in the extraction of channel state information from common off-the-shelf devices have enabled higher accuracy localization methods that extract novel features from raw data [11]- [14]. Meter-level and even decimeter-level localization accuracy have been demonstrated within complex environments [3], [4], [15]. Compared to purely algorithmic methods such as multilateration, CSI has been used to extract uniquely identifying features for fingerprinting (Section III).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIMO-enabled Wi-Fi devices can estimate AoA using the phase difference between individual elements of the antenna array. The authors of [21] utilised the Wi-Fi MIMO antenna systems to provide a higher-dimensional location signature, as well as to showcase the spatial diversity of CSI, resulting in an accuracy of 0.95 m. With two MIMO-enabled APs in a complex small laboratory environment, the AoA estimation accuracy achieved 5.82 • with a localisation accuracy of 0.66 m [24]. Furthermore, a COTS Wi-Fi device with MIMO antennas could provide an error of at most 2.5 • for AoA and AoD when estimating the orientation of an MIMO-enabled Wi-Fi DUT using joint estimation of AoA and AoD and phase correction [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while ranging models based on Time of Flight (TOF), Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA), and Round Trip Time (RTT) have their advantages, they often face challenges with clock synchronization and clock drift [4,9]. Despite the introduction of some countermeasures, they often have higher computational complexity compared to fingerprint localization [16][17][18]. Fingerprint-based localization methods have received widespread attention due to their simple deployment and effective positioning results [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%