2013
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2013.764301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciding to Dissolve: Individual- and Relationship-Level Predictors of Roommate Breakup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other findings from this study appear in Bahns, Crandall, Canevello & Crocker (2013), Canevello & Crocker (2010, Study 1; 2011), Canevello, Granillo, & Crocker (2013, Study 2), Crocker, Canevello, Breines, & Flynn (2010, Study 2). Note that RSC is not included in any analyses in any of these articles.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…Other findings from this study appear in Bahns, Crandall, Canevello & Crocker (2013), Canevello & Crocker (2010, Study 1; 2011), Canevello, Granillo, & Crocker (2013, Study 2), Crocker, Canevello, Breines, & Flynn (2010, Study 2). Note that RSC is not included in any analyses in any of these articles.…”
supporting
confidence: 65%
“…For example, Kerckhoff and Davis (1962) found that value similarity was related to persistence in the relationship among couples who had been dating less than 18 months, but it was no longer related to relationship outcomes among couples who had been dating 18 months or longer. Decisions such as whether or not to continue living with a college roommate are also often based on similarity and made very early in the relationship process (Berg, 1984; Bahns, Crandall, Canevello, & Crocker, 2013).…”
Section: Similarity In the Earliest Stages Of Relationship Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The sample was 74.7% female and ranged in age from 18 to 21 years ( M = 18.1, SD = 0.36; see SOM for additional participant demographics). A sensitivity power analysis for dyadic data (Ackerman & Kenny, 2016) showed that this sample size provides a power of .80 to detect effect sizes as small as pr = .20 at p = .05 for indistinguishable dyads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%