2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04027-6_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deciding the Inductive Validity of ∀ ∃ * Queries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We build on the notions of [3,27,16] and shortly recall here the most important concepts concerning terms and orderings and the specific extensions (concerning constrained clauses) needed in this article. To keep the presentation concise, we restrict ourselves to single-sorted signatures.…”
Section: General Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We build on the notions of [3,27,16] and shortly recall here the most important concepts concerning terms and orderings and the specific extensions (concerning constrained clauses) needed in this article. To keep the presentation concise, we restrict ourselves to single-sorted signatures.…”
Section: General Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reason about such constrained clauses, we use the standard inference rules for constrained ordered resolution and superposition (cf. [16]), enriched by an on-the-fly induction rule called melting.…”
Section: A Constrained Inference Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although loop detection techniques and termination results already exist for the calculus in [17] (see also [16]), strong restrictions are imposed on the syntax of the formulae (e.g. they must be Horn), which are not in general fulfilled by the formulae we consider in the present paper, even in the propositional case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%