2006
DOI: 10.1007/11814771_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decidability and Undecidability Results for Nelson-Oppen and Rewrite-Based Decision Procedures

Abstract: In the context of combinations of theories with disjoint signatures, we classify the component theories according to the decidability of constraint satisfiability problems in finite and infinite models, respectively. We exhibit a theory T 1 such that satisfiability is decidable, but satisfiability in infinite models is undecidable. It follows that satisfiability in T 1 ∪ T 2 is undecidable, whenever T2 has only infinite models, even if signatures are disjoint and satisfiability in T2 is decidable.In the second… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It turns out that, in general, the constraint satisfiability problem for T 1 ∪ T 2 can be undecidable, even if the intersection of the signatures 1 ∩ 2 contains only the equality predicate (see [4]). A way to gain decidability is given by the following result: 15]) Suppose that the constraint satisf iability problem for both theories T 1 , T 2 (in signatures 1 , 2 ) is decidable; then the constraint satisf iability problem for the ( 1 ∪ 2 )-theory T 1 ∪ T 2 is also decidable as long as T 1 , T 2 are both T 0 -compatible for some universal and effectively locally f inite…”
Section: A Combination Results For Non-disjoint Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turns out that, in general, the constraint satisfiability problem for T 1 ∪ T 2 can be undecidable, even if the intersection of the signatures 1 ∩ 2 contains only the equality predicate (see [4]). A way to gain decidability is given by the following result: 15]) Suppose that the constraint satisf iability problem for both theories T 1 , T 2 (in signatures 1 , 2 ) is decidable; then the constraint satisf iability problem for the ( 1 ∪ 2 )-theory T 1 ∪ T 2 is also decidable as long as T 1 , T 2 are both T 0 -compatible for some universal and effectively locally f inite…”
Section: A Combination Results For Non-disjoint Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known (cf. [5]) that such a problem without any other assumption on T 1 and T 2 is undecidable; nevertheless, the following theorem holds: Theorem 1 ( [11]) Consider two theories T 1 , T 2 in signatures Σ 1 , Σ 2 such that:…”
Section: A Brief Overview On Non-disjoint Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a preliminary step to applying SP, we need to partially instantiate axioms (18) and (20) with the constants of sort array and bool occurring in L. This is so because SP does not seem to terminate on theories axiomatizing enumerated data types such as the Booleans (see [4] for a discussion on this point).…”
Section: A Rewriting-based Procedures For Adp Dommentioning
confidence: 99%