Decentring the Marxian Debate over the Falling Rate of Profit: A New Approach

Cullenberg, Stephen

doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26121-5_11

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…What emerges instead is a characterisation of the firm as the site of the production, appropriation and distribution of an ever changing configuration of class and non-class revenues and expenditures, none of which is central or 20. Cullenberg 1998a, p. 173. 21.…”

Section: I) Rethinking the Logic Of Accumulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Postmodern Contributions to Marxian Economics: Theoretical Innovations and their Implications for Class Politics

Kristjanson-Gural

2008

Hist Mater

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper I seek to establish that a widely held criticism of postmodern Marxism -that it is morally relativist and does not offer a basis for a systematic analysis of capitalism -is not warranted. I provide a systematic review of the postmodern Marxist literature in three distinct areas -value theory, class analysis of the household and state, and class justice -and I draw on these contributions to show that postmodern Marxism offers new insights into problems of concern to Marxian theorists. I argue, further, that it provides the normative grounds for a class politics that is open to new alliances and new strategies for engaging in class struggle.

show abstract

Section: I) Rethinking the Logic Of Accumulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Postmodern Contributions to Marxian Economics: Theoretical Innovations and their Implications for Class Politics

Kristjanson-Gural

2008

Hist Mater

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples of radical humanist research, although not even mentioned in academic finance, are: Biewener (1999Biewener ( , 2000, Cullenberg (1994Cullenberg ( , 1997, Perelman (1987Perelman ( , 1993Perelman ( , 1999 and Tinker et al (1982).…”

Section: Markets: a Paradigmatic Lookmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Radical humanist research in academic finance is non‐existent. Examples of radical humanist research, although not even mentioned in academic finance, are: Biewener (1999, 2000), Cullenberg (1994, 1997), Perelman (1987, 1993, 1999) and Tinker et al (1982).…”

Section: The Radical Humanist Paradigmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Markets: a paradigmatic look

Ardalan

2007

International Journal of Social Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to show that knowledge in general, and knowledge of markets in particular, is ultimately a product of the researcher's paradigmatic approach to a multifaceted phenomenon and therefore it is as much an ethical, moral, social, ideological, and political activity, as it is a technical one. Design/methodology/approach -Any adequate analysis of markets necessarily requires fundamental understanding of the worldviews underlying the views expressed with respect to the nature and role of markets. This paper starts with the premise that any worldview can be associated with one of the four basic paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist.Findings -It shows that any view expressed with respect to markets is based on one of the four paradigms or worldviews and is equally scientific and informative.Research limitations/implications -The paper's discussion is limited to only four paradigms. Originality/value -The paper notes that there are opportunities for functionalist mainstream academic finance to benefit from contributions coming from the other three paradigms and obtain a balanced view of the subject of their study.

show abstract

Section: The Radical Humanist Paradigmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate governance: a paradigmatic look

Ardalan

2007

International Journal of Social Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a paradigmatic look at corporate governance.Design/methodology/approachThis paper starts with the premise that any worldview can be associated with one of the four basic paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist. The paper looks at the current state of mainstream academic finance and notes that it is founded only on the functionalist paradigm. It argues that any view expressed with respect to corporate governance is based on one of the four paradigms or worldviews. It, therefore, discusses four views expressed with respect to the nature and role of corporate governance.FindingsThe paper emphasizes that the four views expressed are equally scientific and informative; they look at the nature and role of corporate governance from a certain paradigmatic viewpoint. Emphasizing this example in the area of corporate governance, the paper concludes that there are opportunities for mainstream academic finance, in general, and corporate governance, in particular, to benefit from contributions coming from the other three paradigms if they respect paradigm diversity.Originality/valueThe paper recommends a serious conscious thinking about the social philosophy upon which finance, in general, and corporate governance, in particular, is based and of the alternative avenues for development.

show abstract

Decentring the Marxian Debate over the Falling Rate of Profit: A New Approach

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

Postmodern Contributions to Marxian Economics: Theoretical Innovations and their Implications for Class Politics

Postmodern Contributions to Marxian Economics: Theoretical Innovations and their Implications for Class Politics

Markets: a paradigmatic look

Corporate governance: a paradigmatic look

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About