2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Supervision and Coordination of Concurrent Discrete Event Systems under LTL Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of uncontrollable events in DES control problems is often considered through Rabin games, where the uncontrollable events are modeled as an adversary player [35], [36], [37]. The control specification can be modeled by both finite automata and LTL formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of uncontrollable events in DES control problems is often considered through Rabin games, where the uncontrollable events are modeled as an adversary player [35], [36], [37]. The control specification can be modeled by both finite automata and LTL formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, linear temporal logic (LTL) [3] is paid much attention to as a formal specification language for control problems, thanks to its rich expressiveness. Controller synthesis problems with temporal logic specifications are widely studied for many types of system models [4]- [8]. It is practically acceptable to restrict the specification language to a subclass of LTL like syntactically co-safe LTL (scLTL), for which synthesis problems can be solved in much less complexity than for the case of the general LTL [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, its analysis and controlling are much complicated and sometimes remain NP-hard. The decentralized supervision of DES has been studied for automata models as a well-explored topic by a deluge of researchers; many contributions can be found in Cai and Wonham (2009); Giua et al (2017); Mannani and Gohari (2008); Miranbeigi et al (2017); Qamsane et al (2016); Sakakibara and Ushio (2018); Stursberg and Hillmann (2017); Tebekaemia and Wijesekerab (2019); Tong et al (2018); Wong and Lee (2002); and Yoo and Lafortune (2005). However, few contributions can be found using Petri nets paradigm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%