1990
DOI: 10.1109/9.53544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized stabilization and pole assignment for general proper systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
188
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
188
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…holds for every permutation (j 1 , j 2 , ..., j ν ) of the set {1, 2, ..., ν} and p ∈ {1, ..., ν − 1} [13].…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…holds for every permutation (j 1 , j 2 , ..., j ν ) of the set {1, 2, ..., ν} and p ∈ {1, ..., ν − 1} [13].…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been proposed in the literature to find the DFMs of a system [12], [13], [14]. The notion of quotient fixed modes (QFM) was subsequently introduced in [15] to investigate the stabilizability of a system with respect to all (nonlinear and time-varying) decentralized controllers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [10], a (centralized) controllable and observable mode is a DFM of the system S if and only if there exist a permutation of f1; 2; . .…”
Section: A Matrix Rank Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following definition was presented in [7] for strictly proper systems and generalized in [10] for proper systems. …”
Section: Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation