2012
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2011.653513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Recruitment and Selection in Thailand: Friend or Foe to Local Public Administration?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also a decisive factor that leads to a better public service motivation of those who are selected, recruited and placed on the job in public employers. All of this is to be geared toward the citizen's satisfaction with regards to the public service quality [19] [24] [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also a decisive factor that leads to a better public service motivation of those who are selected, recruited and placed on the job in public employers. All of this is to be geared toward the citizen's satisfaction with regards to the public service quality [19] [24] [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HRM, this often finds expression in building up or ensuring that the civil service has an “esprit de corps” of national identity and that it effectively and inclusively (across all ethnic groups and geographic areas) implements and co‐shapes a broad development agenda. This is quite challenging, and recent decentralization efforts cause a need for developing public sector workforces of subnational excellence, as well (Rohitarachoon and Hossain, ). Second, a cadre of senior public managers is needed to provide leadership to the civil service.…”
Section: Human Resources Management Paradigm In Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus a trade‐off between protection against patronage and flexibility (Coggburn ), and it has therefore been pointed out that decentralizing reforms that were started in OECD countries are not appropriate all over the world (Schick ; Pritchett and Woolcock ). For instance, a case study of Thailand revealed that extensive decentralization of recruitment led to the spread of patronage on the local level (Rohitarachoon and Hossain ). Another case study on Trinidad and Tobago shows that there was concern that planned decentralization reforms would lead to increased ethnic discrimination.…”
Section: Previous Research and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%