2017
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2016.2599848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Reactive Power Optimization Method for Transmission and Distribution Networks Accommodating Large-Scale DG Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) (Simple) The feasible region S is defined in the form of time-decoupled intervals, which is simple and efficient for practical applications. In contrast to the transmissiondistribution coordination methods [3]- [5] using iterative decomposition algorithms, with the proposed method, the distribution grid can conveniently participate in transmission operation by reporting the concise and compact feasible region S.…”
Section: A Inner-box Approximation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) (Simple) The feasible region S is defined in the form of time-decoupled intervals, which is simple and efficient for practical applications. In contrast to the transmissiondistribution coordination methods [3]- [5] using iterative decomposition algorithms, with the proposed method, the distribution grid can conveniently participate in transmission operation by reporting the concise and compact feasible region S.…”
Section: A Inner-box Approximation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, managing a large population of DER devices for system-wide operation and control is challenging due to the computational complexity. References [3]- [5] apply decomposition methods to incorporate transmission and distribution in economic dispatch and reactive power optimization. However, these methods require a number of iterations and boundary information exchanges between transmission and distribution, and may suffer from slow convergence issues given the sheer scale of this problem due to the large amount of DERs, thus they are arduous for practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). It allows assigning higher generation levels to the controllable units (feeders [1][2][3][4] or to the uncontrollable units (feeders 5-8). • Constant load: This parameter defines which possible vision of the future power grid is considered for the generated T&D system.…”
Section: Key Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , Q n ) (11) where g(·) expresses a mapping relation from load distribution to reactive power control scheme; (P 1 , . .…”
Section: Relationship Between the Data Source And The Optimal Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%