2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.osnem.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized privacy preserving services for Online Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Efforts are rife in literature with the aim of logically decentralizing the functionalities of OSNs and mitigate privacy issues. Based on the literature, decentralized architectures can be implemented using multiple independent and trusted servers [2,13,30]. Some of these efforts used federated architectures as proposed in [26].…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Online Social Network Sensitive Data Promentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efforts are rife in literature with the aim of logically decentralizing the functionalities of OSNs and mitigate privacy issues. Based on the literature, decentralized architectures can be implemented using multiple independent and trusted servers [2,13,30]. Some of these efforts used federated architectures as proposed in [26].…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Online Social Network Sensitive Data Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web 2.0 remain a critical network infrastructure and knowledge platform for entities -man, machine, group, and even brain-like computer -to exchange and share information, knowledge, wisdom and data [3]. One of the most remarkable phenomena that blossomed in the Web 2.0 era is Online Social Networks (OSNs) that include Facebook, MySpace, also addresses the challenges of the Free-service provisioning capability of the OSNs model that supports targeted and retargeted marketing intentions that makes it easy for malicious users to target users' sensitive data [11][12][13]. Therefore, it will be difficult to give the users of OSN a false hope of control over their privacy of data [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, without proper design and implementation, decentralized online social networks can have serious issues on users' privacy. A comparison between two architectures, decentralized and centralized online social networks, with regards to users' privacy is discussed in [18].…”
Section: Sn Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Rathore et al [10] constructed a labeled dataset of the two most prominent SNSs -Twitter and Facebook. L. Bahri et al [11] discuss the issues related to privacy preservation between centralization and decentralization, and provide a review of available research work on decentralized privacy preserving services for social networks. K. F. Man et al [12] introduces GA and developed a framework of a design tool for industrial engineers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%