2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence &Amp; Computing, Advanced &Amp; Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing &Amp; Commun 2017
DOI: 10.1109/uic-atc.2017.8397424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized microservice workflows for coalition environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of MDO operations, the sensors and services will have been developed and owned by different MDO partners and standard centralized approaches, using formal ontology's to facilitate service definition and service matching for configuring applications are unlikely to work. The use of semantic vector representations to describe the sensors and services offers an alternative paradigm and in [2][3][4] it has been shown that service definition, service matching and decentralized service composition can be achieved using an approach based on Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) and that the approach offers significant advantages in environments where communication is limited or unreliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of MDO operations, the sensors and services will have been developed and owned by different MDO partners and standard centralized approaches, using formal ontology's to facilitate service definition and service matching for configuring applications are unlikely to work. The use of semantic vector representations to describe the sensors and services offers an alternative paradigm and in [2][3][4] it has been shown that service definition, service matching and decentralized service composition can be achieved using an approach based on Vector Symbolic Architectures (VSAs) and that the approach offers significant advantages in environments where communication is limited or unreliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…β€’ {𝑍 1 , 𝑍 2 , 𝑍 3 , … 𝑍 𝑛 } are the sub-feature vectors being combined for the individual nodes of Figure 1. Each 𝑍 𝑛 itself can be a compound vector representing a sub-workflow or a complex vector description for an individual service step, built using the methods described by Simpkin et al; 21 β€’ 𝑝 0 , 𝑝 1 , 𝑝 2 , … are a set of known atomic role vectors used to define the current position or step in the workflow.…”
Section: Vsa Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that this can be performed efficiently using 10,000 bit BSC HVs. The vector library size in these type of applications depends on the number of IoBT services in the network with each service comparing its own service description vector(s) with the unbound workflow vector to determine if they are candidates to perform the next action required 13,14,20,21 . This vector comparison is performed in parallel by all the IoBT services and so the clean-up memory library is essentially distributed across the communications network.…”
Section: Bsc Vs Shv Bundling Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations ( 11) and (12) show the state of the workflow vector after the first and second unbinding. Only Z 1 is visible in Eq.…”
Section: Describing Workflows Using Vector Symbolic Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work [1,5,10,11,12], we have addressed this challenge by making use of a Vector Symbolic Architecture (VSA) [13,14,15,16] to encode functional representations of micro-services and workflows into symbolic semantic vector representations. In the previous implementations, we used 10,000 bit binary vectors to represent service descriptions and a hierarchical binding scheme to represent workflows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%