2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3146828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing literature studying trading in a network (e.g., Kranton and Minehart (2001), Rahi and Zigrand (2006), Gale and Kariv (2007), Gofman (2014), Condorelli and Galeotti (2017), Choi, Galeotti, and Goyal (2017), Malamud and Rostek (2017), Manea (2018), Nava (2015)). These papers typically consider either the sequential trade of a single unit of the asset or a Cournot-type quantity competition.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a growing literature studying trading in a network (e.g., Kranton and Minehart (2001), Rahi and Zigrand (2006), Gale and Kariv (2007), Gofman (2014), Condorelli and Galeotti (2017), Choi, Galeotti, and Goyal (2017), Malamud and Rostek (2017), Manea (2018), Nava (2015)). These papers typically consider either the sequential trade of a single unit of the asset or a Cournot-type quantity competition.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 As an exception, Malamud and Rostek (2017) also used a multi-unit double-auction setup to model a decentralized market. However, they did not consider the problem of learning through trade.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their network model predicts that betterconnected dealers are less exposed to adverse selection, as they observe more order flow, and thus charge a smaller adverse-selection-related markup than peripheral dealers. In addition to BK, Gofman (2011) and Malamud and Rostek (2014) study pricing in networks under information frictions. We test predictions from the information-based theory in BK in Section VII.…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative approaches to endogenous intermediation include the static matching approach (Atkeson, Eisfeldt, and Weill (2015)) and the static network approach (Babus and Kondor (2018); Malamud and Rostek (2017); Gofman (2011);and Farboodi (2014)). I show that some of the key insights of my model, such as the dependence of target asset positions on the level of connectivity and the emergence of speed premium in negotiated prices, are dynamic phenomena and do not arise in static environments.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are two dominant approaches in modeling OTC markets: the dynamic search approach, which my paper belongs to; and the static network approach, with papers such as Malamud and Rostek (2017) and Babus and Kondor (2018). In this section, I will define and solve for an equilibrium in the static network counterpart of my baseline economic environment.…”
Section: Comparison With the Static Network Approach To Otc Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%