The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1061/ajrua6.0001035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized Decision Making for the Restoration of Interdependent Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is an initial step to couple insights from earthquake engineering with complex cyber-physical systems (CPS). Future directions involve advanced power system adequacy analyses for resilience assessment, the role of decentralized restoration processes (Talebiyan and Duenas-Osorio, 2019, 2020), and the quantification of benefits from temporary solutions seen in the field, such as Cell on Wheels (COWs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is an initial step to couple insights from earthquake engineering with complex cyber-physical systems (CPS). Future directions involve advanced power system adequacy analyses for resilience assessment, the role of decentralized restoration processes (Talebiyan and Duenas-Osorio, 2019, 2020), and the quantification of benefits from temporary solutions seen in the field, such as Cell on Wheels (COWs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this setting is more realistic, the associated complexity increases the amount of required information for the decision maker to plan. Some studies in the literature have addressed the decentralized network optimization problem for infrastructures (e.g., see He et al, 2017;Talebiyan and Duenas-Osorio, 2020). Nonetheless, the resulting models are mainly applicable to small or county-level networks, due to the assumption that all actors are individually making decisions (Talebiyan and Duenas-Osorio, 2020).…”
Section: Optimization In Interdependent Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies in the literature have addressed the decentralized network optimization problem for infrastructures (e.g., see He et al, 2017;Talebiyan and Duenas-Osorio, 2020). Nonetheless, the resulting models are mainly applicable to small or county-level networks, due to the assumption that all actors are individually making decisions (Talebiyan and Duenas-Osorio, 2020). Smith et al (2020) investigated noncooperative decision making when information is incomplete and two decision makers cannot negotiate.…”
Section: Optimization In Interdependent Infrastructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where arguments of cost functions are introduced in Table 1, and, for our application, their ranges are adopted from the literature [12,35]. The cost functions are linear, and sum up to their respective cost over all elements across the network for a given time-step t. The feasible space of the solution is defined by several constraints, which can be categorized into five groups:…”
Section: Td-indp Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%