2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ipsn.2006.244056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized compression and predistribution via randomized gossiping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Junction Tree [13] ensures robust packet delivery for distributed inference, but does not use hybrid hardware. [14], a compressive sensing based approach, simultaneously computes random projections of the sensor data and disseminates them using gossiping. The goal is to reduce communication of Nyquist rate sampled data, as opposed to facilitating subNyquist rate signal sampling for low-power devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Junction Tree [13] ensures robust packet delivery for distributed inference, but does not use hybrid hardware. [14], a compressive sensing based approach, simultaneously computes random projections of the sensor data and disseminates them using gossiping. The goal is to reduce communication of Nyquist rate sampled data, as opposed to facilitating subNyquist rate signal sampling for low-power devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g v (x) refers to a subgradient of f v (x), when viewing GGE as an incremental subgradient algorithm 3 . Moreover, the ǫ-averaging time for GGE is bounded above by…”
Section: Gge Convergence Rate: Worst Case Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 We explicitly note that this constant is a function of the underlying topology by writing A(G), and A(G) is completely determined by the neighbourhood structure of the network because the maximization is over all x, and for a fixed x, the subgradients are determined by the neighbourhood structure.…”
Section: Gge Convergence Rate: Worst Case Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, random linear coding has also been utilized in sensor networks for failure tolerant aggregation of distributed data [10], [11], [12]. In both Dimakis et al [10] and Rabbat et al [11]'s work, original data is distributed and encoding is only performed on the destination sensor nodes, in order to store them in a coded form.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both Dimakis et al [10] and Rabbat et al [11]'s work, original data is distributed and encoding is only performed on the destination sensor nodes, in order to store them in a coded form. Compared to Echelon, such uncoded distribution involves larger messaging overhead.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%