2018 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2018.8502656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralized and Dynamic Fault Detection Using PCA and Bayesian Inference

Abstract: This paper proposes a dynamic and decentralized fault detection method. The plant is divided in groups whose members are selected using linear and non-linear modelling techniques. In each group a Principal Component Analysis model does the fault detection, including delayed data to get a dynamic method. Then, a central node fuses the results of each group, using Bayesian Index Criterion (BIC), to get a global detection outcome. The method was tested on a widely used benchmark and compared with other proposal t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…After that, the variables with highest influence in the net output are included in the group along with variable which is the output of the net. As was verified in [18], this model is able to capture the non linear relations between the variables. b) Mutual Information: This method is based on the analysis of the MI matrix.…”
Section: Distributed Fault Detection With Dpcamentioning
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After that, the variables with highest influence in the net output are included in the group along with variable which is the output of the net. As was verified in [18], this model is able to capture the non linear relations between the variables. b) Mutual Information: This method is based on the analysis of the MI matrix.…”
Section: Distributed Fault Detection With Dpcamentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It is known that T 2 monitors the model, while Q processes the noise, disturbances, etc. [6], and, as ANN got better results with T 2 , this method probably had captured the behaviour of the model better than the other methods, as it was stated in [18].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Propuesta de los métodos: MB-DDPCA y MB-DCVA. [Sánchez-Fernández et al, 2018b, Sánchez-Fernández et al, 2018c, Sánchez-Fernández et al, 2019. En esta se-CAPÍTULO 7.…”
Section: Contribuciones Y Publicaciones De La Tesisunclassified