Decentralization Policies in Asian Development 2008
DOI: 10.1142/9789812818645_0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralization in the Philippines After Ten Years — What Have We Learned?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The jurisdictional fragmentation model is the choice for governing metropolitan areas in many low-income and middle-income countries, including some in the Asia-Pacific region. The sixteen cities and one municipality in metropolitan Manila are responsible for those services whose benefits are thought to be contained within local boundaries (World Bank, 2017;Manasan, 2009, p. 338;Diokno, 2009). Each is entitled to levy a property tax and a local sales tax, and they are self-governed.…”
Section: Jurisdictional Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jurisdictional fragmentation model is the choice for governing metropolitan areas in many low-income and middle-income countries, including some in the Asia-Pacific region. The sixteen cities and one municipality in metropolitan Manila are responsible for those services whose benefits are thought to be contained within local boundaries (World Bank, 2017;Manasan, 2009, p. 338;Diokno, 2009). Each is entitled to levy a property tax and a local sales tax, and they are self-governed.…”
Section: Jurisdictional Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon assuming power, President Aquino promised a broad public sector reform package including the devolution of political and administrative authority to local governments (Diokno 2003;Hutchcroft 2004) But slowly, the political landscape began to change with the President´s relentless, indefatigable campaign of tapping the grass roots, of linking with the rural folk and NGOs.…”
Section: Political History Of Decentralization In the Philippinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the passage of the 1991 LGC, the head of the House of Representatives, Speaker Ramon V. Mitra and the Senate President, Jovito R. Salonga were both planning to run for president in the 1992 elections. As a result, there was political grandstanding between the two which resulted in a higher than proposed IRA (Diokno 2003), from the initial proposal of a maximum of 25% to a 40% share of internal revenues. The final result was a staggered annual increase in the IRA from 30% during the first year of implementation to 40% for the third year after.…”
Section: Contextual Factors Favoring Changes In Inter-governmental Relations: Lessons From International Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer of resources from the central government to the LGUs is done through the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA), which has been questioned for its inadequacy and predisposition to corruption (Diokno, 2009). Specifically, central governments should transfer 40% of the revenues collected three years before the year of the distribution to the LGUs (Guevara, 2004).…”
Section: Figure 62 Local Governance Structure In the Philippines Soumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others claim that decentralization negatively affected resource allocation. In the end, provinces received substantially reduced resources despite having the most government functions (Diokno, 2009). Further, decentralization increased government inequities with some LGUs receiving less resources for local income generation and weaker ties at the national level than other LGUs (Langran, 2011).…”
Section: Figure 62 Local Governance Structure In the Philippines Soumentioning
confidence: 99%