Decentralization and health system performance – a focused review of dimensions, difficulties, and derivatives in India

Abstract

IntroductionOne of the principal goals of any health care system is to improve health through the provision of clinical and public health services. Decentralization as a reform measure aims to improve inputs, management processes and health outcomes, and has political, administrative and financial connotations. It is argued that the robustness of a health system in achieving desirable outcomes is contingent upon the width and depth of ‘decision space’ at the local level. Studies have used different approaches to examine one or more facets of decentralization and its effect on health system functioning; however, lack of consensus on an acceptable framework is a critical gap in determining its quantum and quality. Theorists have resorted to concepts of ‘trust’, ‘convenience’ and ‘mutual benefits’ to explain, define and measure components of governance in health. In the emerging ‘continuum of health services’ model, the challenge lies in identifying variables of performance (fiscal allocation, autonomy at local level, perception of key stakeholders, service delivery outputs, etc.) through the prism of decentralization in the first place, and in establishing directed relationships among them.MethodsThis focused review paper conducted extensive web-based literature search, using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines. After screening of key words and study objectives, we retrieved 180 articles for next round of screening. One hundred and four full articles (three working papers and 101 published papers) were reviewed in totality. We attempted to summarize existing literature on decentralization and health systems performance, explain key concepts and essential variables, and develop a framework for further scientific scrutiny. Themes are presented in three separate segments of dimensions, difficulties and derivatives.ResultsEvaluation of local decision making and its effect on health system performance has been studied in a compartmentalized manner. There is sparse evidence about innovations attributable to decentralization. We observed that in India, there is very scant evaluative study on the subject. We didn’t come across a single study examining the perception and experiences of local decision makers about the opportunities and challenges they faced. The existing body of evidences may be inadequate to feed into sound policy making. The principles of management hinge on measurement of inputs, processes and outputs. In the conceptual framework we propose three levels of functions (health systems functions, management functions and measurement functions) being intricately related to inputs, processes and outputs. Each level of function encompasses essential elements derived from the synthesis of information gathered through literature review and non-participant observation. We observed that it is difficult to quantify characteristics of governance at institutional, system and individual levels except through proxy means.ConclusionThere is an urgent need to sensitize governments and academia about how best more obje...

Health system strengthening—Reflections on its meaning, assessment, and our state of knowledge

“…There is evidence that complex leadership programmes blending skills development, mentoring, and promotion of teamwork bring about improvements in service quality, management competence, and motivation There is mixed evidence on the effect of decentralisation on health outcomes and access to services . At the mesolevel, some evidence suggests that it may facilitate intersectoral partnerships and promote improvements in health, equity, and efficient use of resources.…”

Application of evidence-informed deliberative processes in health technology assessment in low- and middle-income countries

“…However, it is interesting to note that the majority of the respondents mentioned to have an appraisal committee/stakeholder panel in place. This might be due to the fact that several of LMIC have existing structures through which stakeholders can participate in health system decision making (9). For example, many LMIC have established public health committees, health unit management committees, or National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups.…”

Health System Outcomes in BRICS Countries and Their Association With the Economic Context

“…As part of health insurance, there is the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS)-and the Employees' State Insurance Scheme (ESIS). However, the most common source of spending in India are out-of-pocket payments, which makes India one of the most privatized healthcare sectors in the world (9). In China, the healthcare market is fueled by changes in the population structure and a government initiative seeking to ensure wider access to medical care (10).…”