2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2008.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralised decision making in heterogeneous teams using anonymous optimisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of this family, the distributed gradient-descent based optimization (DGO) algorithm is guaranteed to find an optimal solution to quadratic optimization problems (Tsitsiklis et al, 1986;Mathews et al, 2009). The DGO algorithm is a cooperative distributed problem solving method.…”
Section: Solving Dsucs With No Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of this family, the distributed gradient-descent based optimization (DGO) algorithm is guaranteed to find an optimal solution to quadratic optimization problems (Tsitsiklis et al, 1986;Mathews et al, 2009). The DGO algorithm is a cooperative distributed problem solving method.…”
Section: Solving Dsucs With No Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…consensus, motion planning) or discrete (ie. TA problems such as mission planning and vehicle routing) [2]. The focus in this work is on the TA problem.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most substantial difference is that, often, global system goals are fixed by the task statement, in other words, the task is assigned to the global system and the component control systems goals must be crafted so that when all the components are operating together this global goal is achieved. Hierarchical or sequential task/goal decompositions may be found, so that the local optimization performed by each agent contributes to the global optimum seeking process [104]. This is often achieved in terms of different utility based strategies derived from the agent literature that permit defining private utility functions that will lead to the desired global utility under the appropriate environmental conditions.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, the fulfilment of the global goal emerges spontaneously (synergistically) from the independent fulfilment of the individual tasks/goals. Evidently, the individual tasks must have been formulated in an appropriate way and the global problem must be decomposable (a common research issue in agent literature) [51,104]. This decomposition may be achieved by negotiation as in [130,145], by some form of swarm dynamics [190], or even by some form of learning [17].…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%