2016
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decentralisation; The Question of Management Capacity: A Response to Recent Commentaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through a qualitative approach, we have been able to explore a number of specific policy considerations under the assumption that the synergy works. Several studies on decentralisation in other low- and middle-income countries have also concluded that decentralisation only grants the decision space, but its effective use by decision-makers at lower levels of the system will be realised only when their capacities are built, as was reported, for example, in Fiji [60] and in India [28]. Particularly for the function of planning and priority-setting, capacity-building can improve the use of decision space as noted in Tanzania [61], and enhance transparency and accountability as likewise noted in India [62] and again at district levels in Tanzania [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a qualitative approach, we have been able to explore a number of specific policy considerations under the assumption that the synergy works. Several studies on decentralisation in other low- and middle-income countries have also concluded that decentralisation only grants the decision space, but its effective use by decision-makers at lower levels of the system will be realised only when their capacities are built, as was reported, for example, in Fiji [60] and in India [28]. Particularly for the function of planning and priority-setting, capacity-building can improve the use of decision space as noted in Tanzania [61], and enhance transparency and accountability as likewise noted in India [62] and again at district levels in Tanzania [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turner (1999, p. 4), conceptualized "decentralization as involving transmitting authority to perform some services from an individual or an agency in central government to some other individuals or agencies that are 'closer' to the people to be served." Contemporary studies view it from the perspective of intergovernmental relations (Mohammed et al, 2017;Schneider, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars averred that “to rebuild relationships between citizens and their LGs means working on both sides of the equation - that is, going beyond ‘civil society’ or ‘state-based’ approaches, to focusing on their intersection, through new forms of participation, responsiveness, and accountability” (Fung, 2006; Gaventa, 2003, p. 2). Turner (1999, p. 4), conceptualized “decentralization as involving transmitting authority to perform some services from an individual or an agency in central government to some other individuals or agencies that are ‘closer’ to the people to be served.” Contemporary studies view it from the perspective of intergovernmental relations (Mohammed et al, 2017; Schneider, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decentralization, a concept that spans a range of disciplines including management, social policy, and geography, is variously described with no agreement on a particular definition [ 22 ]. As a health system reform mechanism, decentralization is a socio-political process that aims to improve health outcomes by redistributing service delivery from the centre to better address local healthcare needs [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%