2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deceleration in the Earth's oblateness

Abstract: [1] For over three decades, satellite laser ranging (SLR) has recorded the global nature of the long-wavelength mass change within the Earth system. Analysis of the most recent time series of 30 day SLR-based estimates of Earth's dynamical oblateness, characterized by the gravitational degree-2 zonal spherical harmonic J 2 , indicates that the long-term variation of J 2 appears to be more quadratic than linear in nature. The superposition of a quadratic and an 18.6 year variation leads to the "unknown decadal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
322
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
322
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TWS obs is derived from the GRACE Tellus Mascon product version 2 based on the GRACE gravity fields Release 05, processed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (Watkins et al, 2015;Wiese, 2015). The GRACE solutions were corrected for geocentric motion coefficients, according to Swenson et al (2008), and for variations in Earth's oblateness (C20 coefficient) obtained from satellite laser ranging (Cheng et al, 2013). The glacial isostatic adjustment has been accounted for using the model by A et al (2013).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TWS obs is derived from the GRACE Tellus Mascon product version 2 based on the GRACE gravity fields Release 05, processed at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) (Watkins et al, 2015;Wiese, 2015). The GRACE solutions were corrected for geocentric motion coefficients, according to Swenson et al (2008), and for variations in Earth's oblateness (C20 coefficient) obtained from satellite laser ranging (Cheng et al, 2013). The glacial isostatic adjustment has been accounted for using the model by A et al (2013).…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each monthly solution, we first corrected the coefficients by replacing degree 1 [53], and zonal degree two [54] by using CSR's spherical harmonics in January 2006. We also corrected the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) IJ05_R2 model [55].…”
Section: Grace Gravimetry Mission Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GRACE solutions were corrected for geocentric motion coefficients, according to [42] and for variations in Earth's oblateness (C20 coefficient) obtained from Satellite Laser Ranging [43]. The Glacial isostatic adjustment has been accounted for using the model by [44].…”
Section: Grace-derived ∆Twsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the mascon solutions in the version which applies the Coastline Resolution Improvement (CRI) filter, for more information see [39]. The GRACE solutions were corrected for geocentric motion coefficients, according to [42] and for variations in Earth's oblateness (C20 coefficient) obtained from Satellite Laser Ranging [43]. The Glacial isostatic adjustment has been accounted for using the model by [44].…”
Section: Grace-derived ∆Twsmentioning
confidence: 99%