Floral Biology 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deceit Pollination in the Monoecious, Neotropical Herb Begonia oaxacana (Begoniaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Cucurbitaceae and in species of Begonia (Begoniaceae) the stigmas of the pistillate flowers resemble an androecium (Vogel 1978) (Figs. 6, 10), so that although these flowers offer only nectar, or in some cases neither nectar nor pollen, pollinators are deceived into visiting them by this imitation of the stamens of staminate flowers (Agren and Schemske 1991, Schemske and Agren 1995, Schemske et al 1996. Dukas (1987) observed that honeybees clearly prefer the staminate flowers of Ecballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae), whereas solitary bees visit staminate and pistillate flowers with equal frequency .…”
Section: Melampyrum Prat Ense Mimulus Guttatus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Cucurbitaceae and in species of Begonia (Begoniaceae) the stigmas of the pistillate flowers resemble an androecium (Vogel 1978) (Figs. 6, 10), so that although these flowers offer only nectar, or in some cases neither nectar nor pollen, pollinators are deceived into visiting them by this imitation of the stamens of staminate flowers (Agren and Schemske 1991, Schemske and Agren 1995, Schemske et al 1996. Dukas (1987) observed that honeybees clearly prefer the staminate flowers of Ecballium elaterium (Cucurbitaceae), whereas solitary bees visit staminate and pistillate flowers with equal frequency .…”
Section: Melampyrum Prat Ense Mimulus Guttatus)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research on the evolution of floral traits that function directly in pollination has focused on flower diameter, shape, colour, or nectar production (Schemske and Horwitz 1989;O'Connell and Johnston 1998;Totland and Sandvik 2000). The likelihood of selection on such floral traits has been pointed out in several studies (Campbell 1989(Campbell , 1996Galen 1989Galen , 1996Schemske and Horwitz 1989;Widén 1991;Herrera 1993;Mitchell 1994;Conner et al 1996;Schemske et al 1996;Mitchell et al 1998;O'Connell and Johnston 1998;Totland et al 1998;Armbruster et al 2000;Maad 2000;Totland 2001). Few studies have, however, focused on the evolution of stamen morphology or function in relation to the quality and quantity of pollinator visitation (but see Harder and Barrett 1993;Harder and Barclay 1994;Buchman 1995, 1996;Walker-Larsen and Harder 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…flower colour (Kay 1978;Waser and Price 1981;Stanton 1987), size (Bell 1985;Eckhart 1991;Conner and Rush 1996), nectar production (Mitchell 1994), floral morph in heterostylous species (Wolfe and Barrett 1987;Husband and Barrett 1992), and gender in unisexual species (Kay et al 1984;Ågren et al 1986;Bierzychudek 1987;Eckhart 1991;Schemske et al 1996). Insect visitation may also be significantly influenced by the spatial and temporal arrangement of flowers in the floral display (Handel 1985;Cruzan et al 1988;Schmid-Hempel and Speiser 1988;Thomson 1988;Klinkhamer et al 1989;Klinkhamer and de Jong 1990;Eckhart 1991;de Jong and Klinkhamer 1994) and in a given neighbourhood (Klinkhamer et al 1989;Feinsinger et al 1991;Kunin 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%