2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP): Evaluation of the main 243Cm and 245Cm decay characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; (2) library name (CENDL-DDL1.0), material number, date type (i.e., radioactive decay data), and format type (ENDF-6); (3) detailed comments on the evaluation; (4) specific decay data not contained in the main decay data section and consistency check of the recommended data set. In the data section (MF=8, MT=457), the recommended decay data for the following characteristics are listed for each nuclide: (1) Spin and parity of the level of parent nuclide; (2) half-life of the level of the parent nuclide in second unit; (3) mean energy for γ (including Xray) and β (or heavy) particles; (4) decay mode, decay energy (Q-values), branching fraction, and isomeric branching fraction for isomeric state; (5) energy and emission probability of γ-ray; (6) energy, emission probability, and transition type of β-particle; (7) energy, emission probability, and transition type of electron-capture; (8) energy and emission probability of α-particle; (9) energy and emission probability of delay-neutron; (10) energy and emission probability of delay-proton; (11) energy and emission probability of discrete-electron; (12) energy and emission probability of X-ray.…”
Section: B Data Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; (2) library name (CENDL-DDL1.0), material number, date type (i.e., radioactive decay data), and format type (ENDF-6); (3) detailed comments on the evaluation; (4) specific decay data not contained in the main decay data section and consistency check of the recommended data set. In the data section (MF=8, MT=457), the recommended decay data for the following characteristics are listed for each nuclide: (1) Spin and parity of the level of parent nuclide; (2) half-life of the level of the parent nuclide in second unit; (3) mean energy for γ (including Xray) and β (or heavy) particles; (4) decay mode, decay energy (Q-values), branching fraction, and isomeric branching fraction for isomeric state; (5) energy and emission probability of γ-ray; (6) energy, emission probability, and transition type of β-particle; (7) energy, emission probability, and transition type of electron-capture; (8) energy and emission probability of α-particle; (9) energy and emission probability of delay-neutron; (10) energy and emission probability of delay-proton; (11) energy and emission probability of discrete-electron; (12) energy and emission probability of X-ray.…”
Section: B Data Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[66], and the weighted average calculated by Ref. [68]. The thick line is the weighted average of all the present experimental runs and the dotted lines are the total uncertainty on the weighted average.…”
Section: Literature Valuesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[66] and [68] to calculate the weighted average. In the 240 Pu case the literature values correspond to: Fieldhouse (1967) [69], Budtz-Jørgensen (1980) [25], Androsenko (1984) [70], Selickij (1988) [71], Dytlewski (1989) [72], Ivanov (1991) [73] and Holden (2000) [66], and Chechev (2009) [68]. The literature values for the 242 Pu are: Studier (1956) (cited by Ref.…”
Section: Literature Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation