1978
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decamethonium both opens and blocks endplate channels.

Abstract: Miniature endplate currents, endplate current fluctuations ("membrane noise"), and voltage-jump current relaxations were studied in voltage-clamped frog muscle fibers during decamethonium action. All three types of experiments revealed two kinetic processes controlling the opening of endplate channels, one that reflects agonist action and another that reflects local anesthetic-like blocking activity. The kinetic constants for these two steps were evaluated from measurements of the fast and slow time constants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
64
1

Year Published

1981
1981
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value for decamethonium binding to the fast channel, 1.58 x 107 M-1s-I at -80 mV, is similar to the estimate by Adams & Sakmann (1978) of its rate of binding to ACh-operated channels at the frog neuromuscular junction measured at -130 mV (1.71 x 107 M-'s-1). A plot of the rates of association to the two kinds of channel against the chain length of the methonium drugs (Figure 4) shows some variation but no obvious pattern in the structure-activity relationship.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value for decamethonium binding to the fast channel, 1.58 x 107 M-1s-I at -80 mV, is similar to the estimate by Adams & Sakmann (1978) of its rate of binding to ACh-operated channels at the frog neuromuscular junction measured at -130 mV (1.71 x 107 M-'s-1). A plot of the rates of association to the two kinds of channel against the chain length of the methonium drugs (Figure 4) shows some variation but no obvious pattern in the structure-activity relationship.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The third component was slower, and was further slowed by hyperpolarisation (see Figure 2); it was taken to represent unblocking of open channels as the drug dissociates (Adams, 1976;Adams & Sakmann, 1978). The presence of this slow component introduces more uncertainty into the estimates of the association rate constants, partly because of the problem of resolving the three exponential components, and partly because we cannot be sure that kis small enough to justify the use of equations (1) and (2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This possibility seems more plausible since the chemically similar compound, decamethonium, appears to travel through the muscle nicotinic receptor channel (Creese & Maclagan 1970). In addition, decamethonium has been shown to block the muscle nicotinic receptor channel at high concentrations (Adams & Sakmann, 1978). Hexamethonium is believed to act by blocking neuronal nicotinic receptor channels at effective doses (Ascher et al, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaps briefer than 200 ,us were left unfitted in each case, as they are difficult to distinguish at high agonist concentrations and should be relatively independent of agonist concentration. (Adams & Sakmann, 1978;Sine & Steinbach, 1984; Ogden Marshall, Ogden & Colquhoun, 1990). Another method that we used to quantify the channel block by DMPP was to measure the number of blockages per unit open time at different agonist concentrations (Ogden & Colquhoun, 1985).…”
Section: A Mathie S G Cull-candy and D Colquhounmentioning
confidence: 99%