Decalcification and bond failure: A comparison of a glass ionomer and a composite resin bonding system in vivo

Gaworski, Matthew; Weinstein, Martin; Borislow, Alan J.; Braitman, Leonard E.

doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70182-4

Cited by 69 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The lower failure rate in this study in comparison with our study (15.7%) may be related to the small sample (20 patient) and to the shorter treatment period (6 months). Gaworski et al [35] also have found significant differences between RMGI and CM in 16 patients. The failure rate they recorded (24.9%) was about twice what we have found.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Bond Failure Rate of MBT Brackets Bonded with either Self-Etching Primer or Resin Modified Glass Ionomer vs Conventional Method – an in Vivo Study

Dandachli¹

2015

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As capability of the enamel surface to micromechanical adhesion with adhesives is not good enough to provide sufficient bond strength, enamel preparation is considered a necessary step before bonding [1]. With the development of the acid etching by Buonocore, enamel preparation by phosphoric acid is considered the most popular used method among orthodontists. Although this technique provides sufficient bond strength to resist orthodontic and masticatory forces [2], it is a multi-stage method and has many disadvantages, including enamel loss through etching [3], the need to dry the field during bonding [4] and the difficulty in removing the remnant resin after debonding [5].In the attempt to reduce phosphoric acid disadvantages and to simplify bonding procedure, different alternatives have been tested [6]. Selfetching primer SEP as a new system was introduced in order to move away from acid etching AbstractBackground. Self-etching primer and resin modified glass ionomer has been introduced to counter phosphoric etching disadvantages. Objectives. Evaluation of the bond failure rate of MBT stainless steel brackets bonded with either self etching primer SEP or resin modified glass ionomer RMGI in comparison with conventional methods CM. Material and Methods. 46 patients with complete permanent dentition were involved in this study. A total of 920 Gemini MBT ® brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded using a split-mouth design. For each patient, four adhesives systems were used: self etching primer SEP (Transbond Plus

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Bond Failure Rate of MBT Brackets Bonded with either Self-Etching Primer or Resin Modified Glass Ionomer vs Conventional Method – an in Vivo Study

Dandachli¹

2015

Dent. Med. Probl.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, a total of 6 trials were accepted for review and analysis, all of which were split-mouth design. [1][2][3][4][5][6] A quality of assessment of the included trials was conducted based on evidence of successful protection against subject selection bias and detection/performance bias throughout the trials. Evidence of attrition bias was explored via sensitivity analysis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RM-GIC) may Provide Greater Caries Preventive Effect Compared with Composite Resin, but High-Quality Studies are Needed

Pendrys

2011

Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Clinical studies with Fuji Ortho LC have been inconclusive in this regard. Gaworski et al 20 found a greater percentage of debonds with Fuji Ortho LC compared to a resin adhesive, while others found similar clinical debond rates between Fuji Ortho LC and several resin adhesives. [21][22][23] No clinical studies have examined the survival rate of brackets bonded with ACP-containing adhesives.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Bond Strength of an Amorphous Calcium Phosphate–Containing Orthodontic Adhesive

Foster

Berzins

Bradley

2008

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To determine whether an amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)-containing adhesive has an acceptable level of shear bond strength to be used as an orthodontic adhesive. Materials and Methods: Sixty extracted premolars were randomly divided into three groups for orthodontic bonding. Group 1 used a composite resin adhesive (Transbond XT), group 2 was bonded with an ACP-containing adhesive (Aegis Ortho), and group 3 used a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC). All bonded teeth were stored in distilled water at 37ЊC for 40 Ϯ 2 hours prior to debonding. Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were recorded for each specimen. Results: The mean shear bond strengths for the three test groups were: group 1 (15.2 Ϯ 3.6 MPa), group 2 (6.6 Ϯ 1.5 MPa), and group 3 (8.3 Ϯ 2.8 MPa). A one-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference in bond strengths between the groups. A post hoc Tukey test showed group 1 to be significantly (P Ͻ .001) greater than groups 2 and 3. A Kruskal-Wallis test and a Mann-Whitney U-test showed groups 1 and 3 exhibited lower ARI scores than group 2, but a majority of specimens in each group had greater than 50% of the cement removed along with the bracket during debonding. Conclusions:The ACP-containing adhesive demonstrated a low, but satisfactory bond strength needed to function as an orthodontic adhesive.

show abstract

Decalcification and bond failure: A comparison of a glass ionomer and a composite resin bonding system in vivo

Cited by 69 publications

References 13 publications

Bond Failure Rate of MBT Brackets Bonded with either Self-Etching Primer or Resin Modified Glass Ionomer vs Conventional Method – an in Vivo Study

Bond Failure Rate of MBT Brackets Bonded with either Self-Etching Primer or Resin Modified Glass Ionomer vs Conventional Method – an in Vivo Study

Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement (RM-GIC) may Provide Greater Caries Preventive Effect Compared with Composite Resin, but High-Quality Studies are Needed

Bond Strength of an Amorphous Calcium Phosphate–Containing Orthodontic Adhesive

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About