2012
DOI: 10.1057/jird.2012.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decaf empowerment? Post-Washington Consensus development policy, fair trade and Kenya's coffee industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for Gramsci (1971) hegemony was not static; rather it was the subject of constant volatility and challenge from counter‐hegemonic movements. Imaginaries too are not intrinsically immobile sets of ideas; they are the result of processes of contestation and negotiation at the global, regional, national and local levels (Cox, 1999; Pflaeger, 2013).…”
Section: Understanding the Embeddedness Of Export‐led Development: Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for Gramsci (1971) hegemony was not static; rather it was the subject of constant volatility and challenge from counter‐hegemonic movements. Imaginaries too are not intrinsically immobile sets of ideas; they are the result of processes of contestation and negotiation at the global, regional, national and local levels (Cox, 1999; Pflaeger, 2013).…”
Section: Understanding the Embeddedness Of Export‐led Development: Co...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, effective and equitable development strategies need to incorporate "a rehabilitative dimension oriented to the past, a resolutive dimension oriented to the present, and a preventive dimension oriented to both the present and future" (Leatherman et al, 1999, page 4), as well as recognising the multiple spheres in which empowerment is required (Scheyvens, 1999). However, a key debate within the development literatures questions the extent to which an instrumentalist approach to empowerment, which equates it with participation, can be a substitute for structural reform (Botchway, 2001); terms such as 'decaf empowerment' and 'reverse empowerment' (Pflaeger, 2013;Ruhiiga, 2013) highlight the challenges posed by a separation of intrinsic and instrumental rationales. The privileging of the latter by the multilateral institutions who dominate development rhetoric as practised arguably perpetuates elite control of development, as opposed to ensuring that individuals take responsibility for their own development (Bartlett, 2008;Ruhiiga, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper recognises the complex and contested relationship between empowerment and development, with the latter here understood as, following Sen (1999), those economic, social, and political changes that allow people the choice and opportunity to be active agents. While this paper acknowledges the critiques that have positioned the dominant rhetoric of empowerment as simply legitimising continuing hierarchical forms of development (Pflaeger, 2013), the development landscape is a complex terrain of contestation and resistance, and so this paper aims to explore the potential of this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%