2018
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v114/i04/792-799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decadal Change in Supraglacial Debris Cover in Baspa Basin, Western Himalaya

Abstract: Supraglacial debris cover (SDC) influences surface energy balance and glacier dynamics. However, very few studies have been carried out to understand its distribution and evolution. Previous glacier investigations carried out in Baspa basin, Western Himalaya, focus on retreat and mass balance. Therefore, the present study monitored change in SDC area from 1997 to 2014 using Landsat data. SDC area change was estimated within a 'minimum snow-free glacier area' using normalized difference snow index (NDSI) and ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reflectivity and surface temperature of debris cover, varies according to its constituent material [36]. Some researchers have recommended the NIR/SWIR band ratio (using the DN values) to demarcate debris-covered glacier boundaries [34,35]. In our study, Figure 3e represents the NIR/SWIR map which represents a better identification of the debris-covered parts of the glacier.…”
Section: Normalized Differential Indexing and Band Ratiomentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reflectivity and surface temperature of debris cover, varies according to its constituent material [36]. Some researchers have recommended the NIR/SWIR band ratio (using the DN values) to demarcate debris-covered glacier boundaries [34,35]. In our study, Figure 3e represents the NIR/SWIR map which represents a better identification of the debris-covered parts of the glacier.…”
Section: Normalized Differential Indexing and Band Ratiomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The present study shows that the given threshold value of NDSI (+0.4 for TM,ETM+ and OLI imagery) coincide with the debris free glacier boundaries but does not match with the debris-covered glacier boundary (Figure 3a). The spectral reflectance value from the ice, which is completely buried under thick supraglacial debris, may not be different from the surrounding non-glaciated areas, and hence NDSI proves to be incompetent in delineating debris covered parts of glacier ice [34]. Snow and glacier ice reflect up to 95% of its incoming solar energy at the visible (VIS) band, but reflects 50-80% at the near-infrared (NIR) region, while rock or debris-covered surface reflectivity is highly varied at visible and near-infrared (VNIR), shortwave infrared (SWIR) and thermal infrared (TIR) regions [35].…”
Section: Normalized Differential Indexing and Band Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a significant negative snow cover trend was reported in the upper Indus basins during the winter for the other seasons. The glaciers across the Himalaya were found retreating at a rate of 15.5 ± 11.8 m year -1 and have lost an overall area of 13.6 ± 7.9 % from the last four decades (W. Immerzeel, 2008;Pratibha & Kulkarni, 2018). A conspicuous variation in the trend from west to east over the HKH has been observed in recent studies.…”
Section: Temporal Trend Of Snow Covermentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The large debris-covered area over the ablation zones compared to the accumulation zones indicated the glacial transportation (englacial, subglacial, and supraglacial) of rocks and sediment from the higher to the lower zones, melting and glacial erosion, and hillslope processes (Banerjee and Wani, 2018). Some of the satellite observations have reported increasing debris cover over the Chandra basin glaciers and reported increasing glacier retreat as the major factor (Gaddam et al, 2016;Pratibha and Kulkarni, 2018). The increasing debris cover has also been reported for the Bhaga and Baspa river basins of the Western Himalaya (Pratibha and Kulkarni, 2018;Das and Sharma, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%