Debunking the myth that the majority of medical errors are attributed to communication

Abstract

Context Many articles, book chapters and presentations begin with a declaration that the majority of medical errors are attributed to communication. However, this statement may not be supported by the research reported in the literature. Objectives The purpose of this systematic review is to identify where errors are reported in the research literature. Methods A systematised review was conducted of research articles over the last 20 years (1998‐2018) indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) using term combinations: medical errors, research and communication. Inclusion was based on reported generalised primary research of medical error and the reported causes. Results This systematised review resulted in 2881 research articles, which produced 42 that met the inclusion criteria. Although there was some overlap, three categories of errors were dominant in this research: errors of commission (20 articles; 47.6%), errors of omission (six articles; 14.2%) and errors through communication (four articles; 9.5%). There were 12 (28.5%) articles in which all three categories together significantly contributed to error. Of these 12 articles, errors of commission or omission were dominant in nine articles (21.4%) and errors of communication were prevalent in only three articles (7%). Conclusions The assertion that the majority of medical errors can be attributed to miscommunication is not supported by this systematic review. Overwhelmingly, most reported errors are attributed to errors of omission or commission. Intentionally or unintentionally providing misinformation may mislead patient safety initiatives, and research and funding agency priorities.

Human Factors Considerations in Satellite Operations Human-Computer Interaction Technologies: A Review of Current Applications and Theory

“…Beyond prolonged reaction to an automation failure, failing to act may be attributed to both commission and omission errors [23,24,28].Errors of commission happen when the HITL makes a mistake or error due to incorrect decision-making. Errors of omission occur when the human does nothing when they should have [24,29].…”

Can SBAR be implemented with high fidelity and does it improve communication between healthcare workers? A systematic review

“…Analyses of adverse events and other critical incidents commonly identify communication failures between healthcare providers as major contributing factors. [1][2][3][4] Standardised, structured communication techniques have emerged as a potential solution to these recurring problems. 5 6 The mnemonic SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) constitutes the most well-known such technique.…”

Critical Event Debriefing in a Community Hospital

“…In the United States, medical error has become the third major cause of death following cardiac disease and cancer [5]. Several root cause analyses performed revealed that medical errors are mostly attributed to errors of commission, omission, and communication [6]. Debriefing offers a healthcare team the opportunity to re-examine the clinical encounter, discuss individual and team performance, identify errors, and develop performance improvement strategies through reflective learning processes [7][8][9].…”