2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debulking surgery for advanced thymoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the role of ‘debulking' surgery, in patients in whom complete resection is not feasible, remains unclear. Although some have suggested it to be beneficial (Liu et al , 2006), others reported that it could not affect the outcome as compared with biopsy only, followed by radiotherapy (Ciernik et al , 1994). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the role of ‘debulking' surgery, in patients in whom complete resection is not feasible, remains unclear. Although some have suggested it to be beneficial (Liu et al , 2006), others reported that it could not affect the outcome as compared with biopsy only, followed by radiotherapy (Ciernik et al , 1994). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] However, a subtotal resection may decrease the size of the radiation field and radiation dose needed, reducing damage to surrounding organs. 20,21 In some patients it may be prudent to avoid extensive surgery unless there is a reasonable chance of complete resection.…”
Section: Figure 3 A-dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Role of debulking or subtotal resection is controversial with conflicting datas in favour and against [26,27]. Partial resection has been argued to provide better survival than a simple biopsy in unresectable cases [28].…”
Section: Role Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%