Debt administration in Small Island‐States

Moloney, Kim

doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12347

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 51 publications

(83 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No specific studies exist of the core executive or cabinet in small states despite the fact that, in light of their densely networked societies (Baldacchino 2002), they are ‘least likely’ cases for arguments about coordination and executive government. The literature on public administration in small states, much of which is based on single country studies or general analysis of public administration (Jugl 2019; Randma‐Liiv and Sarapuu 2019), finds that: human resources are limited and so individuals are often called upon to play multiple overlapping roles (Farrugia 1993; Chittoo 2011; Everest‐Phillips and Henry 2018); this has benefits in terms of informal coordination (Chittoo 2011; Moloney 2019); but small size also blurs the line between politics and administration leading to concerns about bureaucratic performance, conflicts of interest, patron–client linkages, and corruption (Benedict 1967, pp. 47–48; Farrugia 1993; Baldacchino 1997, pp.…”

Section: The Core Executive and State Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

The core executive and small states: Is coordination the primary challenge?

Corbett

Veenendaal

Connell

2020

Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article interrogates three key arguments derived from the functional approach to studying the core executive: (1) that coordination is the primary problem that confronts executive decision‐makers; (2) that improved coordination will lead to better governance; and (3) that linkage problems dissipate as policy systems consolidate. Drawing on the experience of hitherto understudied small states, including 112 interviews with political elites, we show how the effects of country size create governance challenges in the form of leader dominance, patronage systems and capacity constraints. Our findings support the call to broaden the focus of functional analysis beyond its traditional emphasis on coordination. For scholars of small states we synthesize existing empirical findings and provide a theoretical justification for future work using an adaptation of the core executive approach.

show abstract

Section: The Core Executive and State Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

The core executive and small states: Is coordination the primary challenge?

Corbett

Veenendaal

Connell

2020

Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration

Moloney

Chou²,

Osei

et al. 2022

Administrative Theory & Praxis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring Sustainable Development Goal Research Trajectories in Small Island Developing States

Raman,

Leal Filho,

Martin

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the alignment of research on small island developing states (SIDSs) with sustainable development goals (SDGs), identifying key focus areas, interdisciplinary connections, research gaps, thematic clusters, and insights from case studies. By employing a mixed methods research design that combines quantitative scientometric analysis with qualitative case studies, this unique study examines the nexus between SIDS research and its contribution to SDGs. The findings reveal that SDG 13 (climate action) and SDG 14 (life below water) dominate SIDS research, emphasizing the need to address climate challenges and marine biodiversity. Economic aspects are underscored by SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production), while urban development and inequality are addressed through SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) and SDG 10 (reduced inequalities). Renewable energy and food security are focal points in SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) and SDG 2 (zero hunger). Moderate research outputs in SDG 3 (good health and well-being) and SDG 15 (life on land) suggest a holistic approach, while lower activity in SDGs 16 (peace), 6 (clean water), 4 (education), and 5 (gender) presents opportunities for further exploration. SIDS research is highly interdisciplinary, as seen through three distinct SDG networks: foundational social goals, economic and environmental objectives, and environmental preservation. The thematic clusters in SIDS research include environmental challenges and adaptation, public health, and socioeconomic development, and energy policy and environmental economics. Case studies from various SIDSs illustrate the complex interplay between environmental sustainability, economic development, and social well-being, highlighting the importance of tailored approaches, international cooperation, and local community engagement. These findings underscore the need for integrated research strategies to address the complex challenges of SIDSs, emphasizing climate action, sustainable economic practices, and comprehensive development approaches to achieve the SDGs effectively.

show abstract

Debt administration in Small Island‐States

Cited by 3 publications

References 51 publications

The core executive and small states: Is coordination the primary challenge?

The core executive and small states: Is coordination the primary challenge?

Methodological Americanism: Disciplinary senility and intellectual hegemonies in (American) public administration

Exploring Sustainable Development Goal Research Trajectories in Small Island Developing States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About