2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debris thickness patterns on debris-covered glaciers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
9
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Debris comprising the medial moraine furthest east on the glacier (immediately to the west of the town of Kennecott) shows considerably more thickness variability and larger mean thickness than the other moraines at the same elevation. This is consistent with the equations described in Anderson and Anderson (2018): thicker debris is more likely to occur at glacier margins where surface velocities are low compared to the glacier interior. Surface lakes (see Part B) and debris cones are also common on this medial moraine which are rare at similar elevations in the glacier interior.…”
Section: Debris Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Debris comprising the medial moraine furthest east on the glacier (immediately to the west of the town of Kennecott) shows considerably more thickness variability and larger mean thickness than the other moraines at the same elevation. This is consistent with the equations described in Anderson and Anderson (2018): thicker debris is more likely to occur at glacier margins where surface velocities are low compared to the glacier interior. Surface lakes (see Part B) and debris cones are also common on this medial moraine which are rare at similar elevations in the glacier interior.…”
Section: Debris Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…But the melt-out of debris is limited by the fact that melt rates are reduced strongly as debris thickens ( Fig. 7; Anderson and Anderson, 2018). The lowest 4 km of the glacier-that appears to not be actively deforming-was once underlaid by active ice (Rickman and Rosenkrans, 1997).…”
Section: Debris Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If melt hotspots control the location of the ZMT then we should expect their effect to be maximized in the ZMT. But if melt hotspots are not dominant then we should expect the mass balance profile to be dictated by the debristhickness melt relationship (or Østrem's curve ) downglacier (e.g., Anderson and Anderson, 2018). We therefore address:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debris-covered tongues are schematized with a convex-concave up-glacier thickness pattern, causing lower tongues to be covered in thick debris that causes debris-covered tongues to stagnate (Anderson and Anderson, 2018;Watson et al, 2017;Kirkbride, 2000;Kirkbride and Deline, 2013). This can be explained with debris being accumulating continuously at the snout at higher rates than it can be evacuated ( Figure 10A2).…”
Section: Consequences For Terminus Retreat and Debris Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process could be an important negative feedback as the further a glacier downwastes the faster debris is supplied to its surface and the more melt is reduced. This is important to take into account in glacier flow and energy balance models (Carenzo et al, 2016;Anderson and Anderson, 2018;Rowan et al, 2015), which often use a uniform debris cover derived solely from headwall erosion and do not take lateral moraine debris supply into account.…”
Section: Consequences For Terminus Retreat and Debris Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%