2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debris Remaining in the Apical Third of Root Canals after Chemomechanical Preparation by Using Sodium Hypochlorite and Glyde: An In Vivo Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Cruz et al . ), previous studies suggest that the use of liquid or gel‐like chelating agents during instrumentation may not significantly affect root canal transportation (Whitbeck et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, Cruz et al . ), previous studies suggest that the use of liquid or gel‐like chelating agents during instrumentation may not significantly affect root canal transportation (Whitbeck et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Chelating agent in gel was utilized during canal scouting and initial glide path, and 10% EDTA liquid solution alternated with 5% NaOCl was used as irrigant during completion of the glide path and shaping. Regardless of whether liquid chelating agents more effectively remove smear layer (H€ ulsmann et al 2002, Lim et al 2003, Cruz et al 2014, previous studies suggest that the use of liquid or gel-like chelating agents during instrumentation may not significantly affect root canal transportation (Whitbeck et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…performed, the irrigating solution must present biocompatibility, in order to keep the integrity of the periapical structures, not promoting irritation of the remaining pulp tissue and allowing repair [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the biopulpectomy treatment, it must help with evacuating organic tissue and draining stagnation. Notwithstanding the kind of treatment to be played out, the inundating arrangement must present biocompatibility, with a specific end goal to keep the respectability of the periapical structures, not advancing aggravation of the rest of the mash tissue and permitting repair [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%