2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2005)9:5(417)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Debonding in RC Beams Shear Strengthened with Complete FRP Wraps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By evaluating the development of shear resistance contributed by both external shear-strengthening FRP (based on the solution of Chen et al (2012)) and internal steel shear reinforcements as the critical shear crack widens, Chen et al (2013) In RC beams shear strengthened using EB FRP and failing due to FRP rupture, the adverse shear interaction exists mainly between the external FRP (V f ) and concrete (V c ), which can be qualitatively explained as follows. As debonding of FRP strips on ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T the beam sides generally precedes the eventual FRP rupture failure as experimentally observed by Cao et al (2005) and , it can be reasonably assumed that the average strain developed in the FRP along the critical shear crack is proportional to the maximum shear crack width. Based on this assumption, it can be easily inferred that the average strain in FRP is also affected by the beam size: the larger the beam size the larger the shear crack width at the FRP rupture failure, and thus the larger degradation of concrete shear resistance mechanism (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By evaluating the development of shear resistance contributed by both external shear-strengthening FRP (based on the solution of Chen et al (2012)) and internal steel shear reinforcements as the critical shear crack widens, Chen et al (2013) In RC beams shear strengthened using EB FRP and failing due to FRP rupture, the adverse shear interaction exists mainly between the external FRP (V f ) and concrete (V c ), which can be qualitatively explained as follows. As debonding of FRP strips on ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T the beam sides generally precedes the eventual FRP rupture failure as experimentally observed by Cao et al (2005) and , it can be reasonably assumed that the average strain developed in the FRP along the critical shear crack is proportional to the maximum shear crack width. Based on this assumption, it can be easily inferred that the average strain in FRP is also affected by the beam size: the larger the beam size the larger the shear crack width at the FRP rupture failure, and thus the larger degradation of concrete shear resistance mechanism (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, often the failure of RC beams shear strengthened with FRP wraps (Jirawattanasomkul et al, 2013; and in some cases with FRP U-jackets [e.g. FRP U-jackets with anchorage (Chen et al, 2016;Kim et al, 2014;Mofidi et al, 2012)], are due to the rupture of FRP, usually preceded by FRP debonding (Cao et al, 2005;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pellegrino y Modena (12) recomendaron un factor de reducción para la relación entre la deformación efectiva y la deformación última, y desarrollaron un modelo siguiendo un acercamiento al modelo de la celosía. Una cantidad importante de trabajos han sido publicados en los últimos años (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), algunos de los cuales han servido de base para guías de cálculo y normativas.…”
Section: Shear Strengthunclassified
“…Pellegrino and Modena (12) recommended a reduction factor for the ratio between the effective and ultimate strain and developed a model based on the truss analogy approach. A significant number of papers have been published on the subject in recent years (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), some of which have served as a basis for engineering guides and codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strengthening is often the most viable choice since rebuilding it usually more costly and time consuming. Structures can be strengthened with a variety of conventional techniques such as steel plate bonding, ferro-cement and increasing the cross-section but experimental studies [1] have shown that the use of Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRP) has many advantages over conventional methods. CFRP composites are the most commonly used of the various types of FRP since they offer many benefits including ease of handling, light weight, durability, strength, corrosion resistance and field-workability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%