SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1190/segam2013-0214.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deblending of simulated simultaneous sources using an iterative approach: An experiment with variable-depth streamer data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1. Quality of source separation Q S and performance I for the iterative projected gradient method for different projection operators: rank reduction (proposed method), f -x deconvolution (Peng and Liu, 2013), and f -k thresholding (Abma et al, 2010). These results correspond to the comparison tests portrayed in Figure 2.…”
Section: Examples Comparison Of Projection Operatorssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1. Quality of source separation Q S and performance I for the iterative projected gradient method for different projection operators: rank reduction (proposed method), f -x deconvolution (Peng and Liu, 2013), and f -k thresholding (Abma et al, 2010). These results correspond to the comparison tests portrayed in Figure 2.…”
Section: Examples Comparison Of Projection Operatorssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…where ν denotes iteration number and λ ½ν is the step size (Goldstein, 1964;Levitin and Polyak, 1966;Bertsekas, 1976). Similar iteration strategies have been used to deblend simultaneous sources by Cheng and Sacchi (2013), Peng and Liu (2013), and Chen et al (2014).…”
Section: Source Separation Via Projected Gradients Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various deblending methods have been developed to separate the interferences for simultaneous shooting data (Abma et al, 2010, Peng et al, 2013, Kontakis and Verschuur, 2014, Cheng and Sacchi, 2015, Haacke et al, 2015, Abma et al, 2015. Most of them make use of coherency enhancement in proper domains, iteratively modelling cross-talk noise and subtracting it from the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%